Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03902340
NCT03902340UnknownNot Applicable

Multicentre, Phase 3, Prospective Study With On-line Randomization, in Single Blind Conditions for the Primary Efficacy Endpoint, Controlled, in Two Parallel Groups, Comparing the Efficacy, Tolerability and Safety of actiTENS Versus Level 2 Systemic Analgesics Recommended for the Treatment of Chronic Nociceptive Pain of Moderate to Severe Intensity in Patients Suffering From Osteoarthritis of the Knee

Sublimed1 site in 1 country110 target enrollmentStarted: December 19, 2018Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions
Drugs

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Sponsor
Sublimed
Enrollment
110
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Efficacy : pain intensity evaluated by a numerus scale from 0 to 10

Study Overview

Brief Summary

This is a phase 3, multicentre, prospective, single-blind on principal efficacy criterion, 2 parallel groups, randomized, controlled clinical study comparing efficacy and safety of actiTENS versus systemic level 2 analgesics recommended for the treatment of moderate or severe, nociceptive, chronic pain in patients suffering from osteoarthritis of the knee.

Detailed Description

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a debilitating chronic condition requiring long-term treatment of pain and inducing functional impairment. More specifically knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a common disease associated with significant morbidity. Its prevalence increases with age dramatically. KOA is frequently associated with pain which can worsen with daily activities. The goals of KOA treatments are to provide pain relief and to improve function and quality of life. For the American college of Rheumatology and despite the frequent use of TENS in treating patients with KOA, questions remained regarding its efficacy. Consequently TENS needs additional clinical studies to demonstrate its efficacy in management of painful osteoarthritis.

The main objective of this study is to demonstrate the efficacy and to the safety of TENS in the management of chronic, nociceptive pain in patient suffering from KOA.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 55 Years (Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Adult > or = 55 years.
  • Being monitored by a rheumatologist in private practice or in a hospital.
  • Presenting nociceptive pain:
  • chronic (for at least 3 months),
  • secondary to knee osteoarthritis confirmed by x-ray: stage 2 and over according to Kellgren and Lawrence.
  • Of moderate to severe intensity equal to or above 4 on a numerical scale of 0-
  • In a situation of analgesic therapy failure for level 1 analgesics:
  • paracetamol and NSAIDS,
  • Prescribed at therapeutic dose : 4 g/d of paracetamol and 1200 mg/d of ibuprofen or equivalent (analgesic dose),
  • For at least 2 weeks,
  • Requiring a level 2 prescription.
  • Affiliated to social security insurance.
  • Informed of the concept and agreeing to use the TENS as a non-medicinal analgesic treatment.
  • Capable of understanding how to use the TENS and the level 2 analgesic treatments.
  • Intellectually and physically able to participate in the study in the opinion of the investigator.
  • Owns a Smartphone to be able to download the actiTENS application.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Current or previous allergy to the actiTENS electrodes.
  • On-going or planned pregnancy and absence of effective contraception (except for menopausal women).
  • Neuropathic pain with a DN4 result > 4/10 or with a positive response to one or more questions in the DN4 clinical examination.
  • Osteoarthritis flare.
  • Surgery planned in the following 6 months.
  • History of multiple operations on the knee concerned.
  • Medicinal or non-medicinal treatments which could influence the pathology being studied.
  • Modification of medicinal or non-medicinal treatments planned in the following 6 months.
  • Current participation in another study.
  • Presence of another painful condition which could perturb the evaluation.
  • Patient with an absolute contraindication to TENS or level 2 systemic analgesic treatments recommended for the treatment of chronic pain of moderate or severe intensity.
  • Patient unable to express his/her consent or deprived of liberty.
  • Patient with cognitive disorder or behaviour rendering him/her unsuitable to follow the instructions for this study.
  • Patient not affiliated to a social security system.

Arms & Interventions

TENS

Experimental

Treatment by non-pharmacological transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS)

Intervention: ActiTENS (Device)

level 2 systemic analgesic treatments

Active Comparator

Treatment by level 2 analgesic pharmacological treatment indicated in the treatment of chronic nociceptive pain of moderate to severe intensity.

Intervention: Level 2 Analgesic Treatments (Drug)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Efficacy : pain intensity evaluated by a numerus scale from 0 to 10

Time Frame: 3 months after dosing

Pain intensity (PI) at M3 between both treatment groups. Numerus scale with a minimum of 0 (no pain) to a maximum of 10 (maximum pain).

Safety : occurence of adverse events

Time Frame: 3 months after dosing

Number of adverse events (AE) occurred during the 3 months of follow-up and due to studied treatments.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Efficacy : drop-outs for inefficacy(Through study completion, an average of 6 months)
  • Efficacy : prolongation of studied treatment(Through study completion, an average of 6 months)
  • Safety : occurrence of Adverse Events (AE)(Through study completion, an average of 6 months)
  • Efficacy : patient global impression of change evaluated by a global impression questionnaire.(1, 3 and 6 months after dosing)
  • Efficacy : pain relief (PAR) evaluated by the pain visual analogue scale (VAS)(1, 3 and 6 months after dosing)
  • Efficacy : quality of life evaluated by the questionnaire EuroQol-5D(1, 3 and 6 months after dosing)
  • Efficacy : pain intensity evaluated by a numerus scale from 0 to 10(1, 3 and 6 months after dosing)
  • Safety : drop-outs for AE and corrective treatments(Through study completion, an average of 6 months)
  • Efficacy : functional status evaluated by the WOMAC score (Western Onatario McMaster score)(1, 3 and 6 months after dosing)
  • Estimation of direct costs.(Through study completion, an average of 6 months)

Investigators

Sponsor
Sublimed
Sponsor Class
Industry
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials