MedPath

Operant Conditioning of Sensory Brain Responses to Reduce Phantom Limb Pain in People With Limb Amputation

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Phantom Limb Pain After Amputation
Lower Limb Amputation
Chronic Pain
Phantom Pain
Upper Limb Amputation
Interventions
Behavioral: Control Group with Peripheral Stimulation Only
Behavioral: Operant Conditioning with Peripheral Stimulation
Registration Number
NCT05880251
Lead Sponsor
VA Office of Research and Development
Brief Summary

The study will investigate the application of a non-pharmacological operant conditioning approach to reduce phantom limb pain (PLP). PLP afflicts 60-90% people who have lost a limb. It can last for years and lead to drug dependence, job loss, and poor quality of life. Current non-pharmacological interventions are encouraging but limited, and their efficacy remains unclear. Limb amputation is known to lead to abnormal sensorimotor reorganization in the brain. Multiple studies have shown that PLP severity is correlated with the extent of this reorganization. The current study will train participants via realtime feedback of brain responses to promote more normal sensorimotor response, with the goal to reduce phantom limb pain.

Detailed Description

The study will be recruiting people who have had a limb amputation (traumatic or atraumatic) and are experiencing chronic phantom limb pain (PLP). Participants will be asked to be seated during the study session. Non-painful peripheral stimulation will be applied to elicit a brain response. Electrodes will be placed on the scalp to record these electrical brain responses during the study session. Visual feedback based on the response will be provided in pseudo realtime. The study will involve three 1-hour sessions per week for 8-9 weeks, followed by 2 follow-up sessions at 3 and 6 months after the last session. Assessments of pain intensity and quality, and neurophysiological sensorimotor response, will be performed before the first session, after the last session, and at follow-up sessions. Additional electroencephalography (EEG) based assessments will also be performed as exploratory measures, to assess inter- and intra- hemispheric functional connectivity and sensorimotor responses associated with amputation and operant conditioning training.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
20
Inclusion Criteria
  • An upper (or lower limb) amputation more than 6 months ago, that has produced a moderate to severe hand/arm (or foot/leg) phantom limb pain,
  • Male or female age 18 years or older,
  • Medical clearance to participate,
  • Reasonable expectation that ongoing medications, if any, will be maintained without change for at least 4 months from the start of the study,
  • Able to provide informed consent and to understand the study instructions,
  • Able to participate in the specific study procedures.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Presence of other medically unstable and/or infectious condition (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes with recent weight loss, diabetic coma, frequent insulin reactions),
  • A cardiac condition (e.g., history of myocardial infarction or congestive heart failure),
  • Cognitive and/or attention difficulties affecting participant's ability to follow study directions,
  • Known skin disorders or damaged skin at the anticipated at the scalp for EEG recording (e.g., unhealed wounds, broken skin).
  • Metal implants above the chest

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Control GroupControl Group with Peripheral Stimulation OnlyControl group receives peripheral stimulation but without operant conditioning feedback.
Intervention GroupOperant Conditioning with Peripheral StimulationIntervention group receives peripheral stimulation with realtime operant conditioning feedback training.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in Somatosensory Evoked Potential (SSEP) Amplitude as Measured by a Tactile Event Related Potential TestBaseline, end of training (session 20) i.e. approximately 10 weeks from baseline, follow-up at 3-months after training ends, follow-up at 6-months after training ends

The evoked response to tactile stimuli will be captured with 64 channel non-invasive scalp electroencephalography (EEG) electrodes placed on the scalp. SSEP will be assessed at the sensorimotor cortex contralateral to the amputated limb. An increase in amplitude will indicate improvement in the sensorimotor cortical response.

Change in Somatosensory Evoked Potential (SSEP) Latency as Measured by a Tactile Event Related Potential TestBaseline, end of training (session 20) i.e. approximately 10 weeks from baseline, follow-up at 3-months after training ends, follow-up at 6-months after training ends

The evoked response to tactile stimuli will be captured with 64 channel non-invasive scalp electroencephalography (EEG) electrodes placed on the scalp. SSEP will be assessed at the sensorimotor cortex contralateral to the amputated limb. A reduction in latency will indicate improvement in the sensorimotor cortical response.

Change in Pain as Measured by the Short form-McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ)Baseline, end of training (session 20) i.e. approximately 10 weeks from baseline, follow-up at 3-months after training ends, follow-up at 6-months after training ends

The Sf-MPQ assesses the pain quality in the sensory (11 items) and affective (4 items) dimensions. Each item is rated on an intensity scale of 0 (none) to 3 (severe). Total score is obtained by summing the scores for all items and the range is 0 (no pain) to 45 (severe pain).

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in Impact of Pain on Quality of Life as Measured by the West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory (WHYMPI)Baseline, end of training (session 20) i.e. approximately 10 weeks from baseline, follow-up at 3-months after training ends, follow-up at 6-months after training ends

This is a 52-item inventory with 12 subscales over 3 domains. Each item is scored on a 0-6 scale. Scores for each subscale are obtained by taking the mean of the scores of all items in that subscale. Higher scores indicate more severity in that subscale.

Part I includes five scales designed to measure important dimensions of the chronic pain experience; Part II assesses patients' perceptions of the degree to which spouses or significant others display Solicitous, Distracting or Negative responses to their pain behaviors and complaints. Part III assesses patients' report of the frequency with which they engage in four categories of common everyday activities; Household Chores, Outdoor Work, Activities Away from Home, and Social Activities.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Albany VA Medical Center Samuel S. Stratton, Albany, NY

🇺🇸

Albany, New York, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath