Low FODMAPs Diet vs. Specific Dietary Advice in Patients With IBS Diarrheal Variant
- Conditions
- Irritable Bowel Syndrome
- Interventions
- Dietary Supplement: Diet low in FODMAPsDietary Supplement: Specific dietary advice for IBS
- Registration Number
- NCT03423069
- Lead Sponsor
- Azienda Ospedaliera Specializzata in Gastroenterologia Saverio de Bellis
- Brief Summary
A reduced content of FODMAPs (fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols) in the diet may be beneficial for patients with IBS diarrheal variant, but so far few randomized trials have reported data in favor of the effective therapeutic superiority of a low-FODMAPs diet compared to specific IBS dietary advice. On this basis, the present study is aimed, in a multidisciplinary perspective, at investigating possible changes in the symptom profile and intestinal permeability, GI peptides concentrations, metabolic and lipidomic profiles induced by these different diets in patients with IBS diarrheal variant.
- Detailed Description
Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) is a functional gastrointestinal disease (GI) affecting 10% -20% of the population and is composed of abdominal pain/discomfort, in combination with alterations of the stool habit. This is a functional disorder prevalent in Italy with double percentages in urban areas (13.7%) compared to rural ones (5.9%). IBS is still one of the main reasons for patients to seek for gastroenterological advice. The diagnosis of IBS is mainly based on the evaluation of symptom profiles by using different scales of assessment and also taking into account non-GI symptoms (e.g. insomnia, anxiety, and depression), as well as the characteristics of the stools. IBS is classified in different subtypes, namely: IBS diarrheal variant (IBS-D), IBS with constipation (IBS-C), IBS mixed variant (IBS-M) and non-classifiable. The pathophysiology is only partially understood and an abnormal motility, together with alterations in gut-brain communication, a low-grade inflammation, and psychosocial factors, have been variously involved. On the other hand, the therapeutic choices are still scarce. The majority of IBS subjects believe that some foods are responsible for their symptoms, tending to exclude them without, however, compromising their nutritional status \[14\]. Many dietary approaches have been proposed, but only a few controlled studies have been performed in this field. Recent evidence suggests that the intake of fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols (FODMAPs) may trigger GI symptoms in patients with IBS. These carbohydrates are poorly absorbed in the small intestine and can pass intact in the colon, where they increase the endoluminal water through the osmotic activity and induce the production of gas due to their fermentation by intestinal bacterial flora. This, in turn, can cause abdominal distension and diarrhea. Data in the literature suggest that a diet with a reduced content in FODMAPs may be beneficial for patients with IBS and diarrhea, but so far few randomized trials have reported data in favor of the effective superiority of a low-FODMAPs diet compared to the specific dietary advice for patients with IBS. On this basis, the present study is aimed at comparing these two diets in a randomized, single-blind clinical trial in IBS patients with diarrhea.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 62
- Rome IV criteria for IBS diarrhea variant (IBS-D).
- Low-lactose diet is allowed, provided that patients agree to keep this intake constant throughout the study period, except in the case of randomization in the treatment arm with a low-FODMAPs diet.
- The use of probiotic products is permitted, and patients who consume probiotic products must be instructed to continue taking the same amount previously taken throughout the study period.
- The drugs used to treat IBS, including antidepressants, will be admitted provided they are used regularly and have a stable dosage for at least one month prior to inclusion in the study.
- Patients must be willing to change their current diet to participate in the study for the whole study period.
- Serious cardiac, hepatic, neurological or psychiatric diseases.
- GI diseases other than IBS (e.g., inflammatory bowel disease, celiac disease) that could explain current symptoms.
- Patients who previously had a low-content diet of particular substances (for example, low FODMAPs content, vegan diet, gluten-free diet). - This last category of subjects will be able to return to the study provided they suspend the gluten-free diet until thes symptoms reappear.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Diet low in FODMAPs Diet low in FODMAPs Diet low in FODMAPs (diet A) during 12 weeks (with intermediate nutritional checks every 4 weeks) before returning to the final study visit. Specific dietary advice for IBS Specific dietary advice for IBS Dietary advice for IBS (diet B) during 12 weeks (with intermediate nutritional checks every 4 weeks) before returning to the final study visit.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in the total score of the irritable bowel syndrome - severity scoring system (IBS-SSS) questionnaire Time frame: Before the start of the study (time 0) and after 90 days of treatment (time 90). IBS-SSS contains 5 specific questions with instructions on how to score them. Each of the five questions (pain severity, pain frequency, abdominal distension severity, bowel movement satisfaction, quality of life) ranges from 0 to a maximum score of 100 using a visual analog scale (VAS), leading to a total possible score of 500.
The primary outcome corresponds to a change in the total score of the IBS-SSS questionnaire at the end of the treatment period compared to baseline, and the proportion of patients who will achieve a difference in the total symptom score of IBS-SSS ≥50 after diet. Such difference is considered a significant clinical improvement.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in the lipidomic profile. Time frame: Before the start of the study (time 0) and after 90 days of treatment (time 90). To evaluate the lipidomic, profile blood samples are collected in vacutainer tubes containing ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). The erythrocytes are separated from the plasma by centrifugation, suspended in pure water, vortexed and subsequently centrifuged to isolate the membrane pellets. Lipid extraction and lipid transesterification to fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs) are performed using an automated protocol. Phospholipidsare will be trans-esterified to FAMEs by treatment with a potassium hydroxide (KOH)/methyl alcohol (MeOH) solution and are extracted using n-hexane. Fatty acids quantification will be performed by using a gas chromatography equipment. Quantification of fatty acid methyl esters is performed using a mixture of standards. The amount of each fatty acid is calculated before and after the dietary interventions, as a percentage of the total fatty acid content (relative %).
Change in the intestinal permeabily evaluation Time frame: Before the start of the study (time 0) and after 90 days of treatment (time 90). For the evaluation of intestinal permeability, a test solution is prepared with 40 g sucrose (Su), 10 g lactulose (La) and 5 g mannitol (Ma) dissolved in 100 ml of water.
The participants drink the test solution in the morning after an overnight fast and all urine samples are collected for the subsequent 5 h. Urine samples were stored at -80°C until analysis. The detection and measurement of the three sugar probes, Su, La, and Ma, in urine are performed by high-performance anion exchange chromatography coupled with pulsed amperometric detection.Change in the score of the single symptom items of the irritable bowel syndrome - severity scoring system (IBS-SSS) questionnaire Time frame: Before the start of the study (time 0) and after 90 days of treatment (time 90). IBS-SSS contains 5 specific questions with instructions on how to score them. Each of the five questions (pain severity, pain frequency, abdominal distension severity, bowel movement satisfaction, quality of life) ranges from 0 to a maximum score of 100 using a visual analog scale (VAS). The secondary outcome is the measure of the effects of the dietary interventions on the individual symptom items score of IBS-SSS, as well as on the characteristics of the stool habit through the administration of the diaries.
Change in the GI peptide concentrations Time frame: Before the start of the study (time 0) and after 90 days of treatment (time 90). To evaluate GI peptide, blood samples are collected in ice chilled tubes containing Aprotinin and EDTA. The separated plasma are stored at -70 °C until assay. Plasma levels of spexin, copeptin, meteorin, somatostatin and serotonin, are measured by enzyme immunoassay technique using commercial kits before and after the dietary interventions
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
IRCCS Saverio de Bellis
🇮🇹Castellana Grotte, Bari, Italy