跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2025/07/090897
CTRI/2025/07/090897尚未招募不适用

" A STUDY TO COMPARE ULTRASOUND GUIDED THORACOLUMBAR INTERFASCIAL PLANE BLOCK (TLIP) AND ERECTOR SPINAE BLOCK (ESP) IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING SPINE SURGERY "- A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED DOUBLE BLIND STUDY.

SDM COLLEGE OF MEDICAL SCIENCE1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 60 人开始时间: 2025年7月30日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
发起方
入组人数
60
试验地点
1
主要终点
At the end of study we hope to ascertain the best

研究概览

简要总结

Title: A study to compare ultrasound-guided thoracolumbar interfascial plane block (TLIPB) and erector spinae plane block (ESPB) in patients undergoing spine surgery – A prospective randomized controlled double-blind study. Summary: This is a prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind study designed to compare the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided thoracolumbar interfascial plane block (TLIPB) and erector spinae plane block (ESPB) in patients undergoing elective thoracolumbar spine surgery. The primary objective is to evaluate and compare the duration of postoperative analgesia provided by both blocks. Secondary objectives include assessing postoperative pain scores and total rescue analgesic consumption within the first 24 hours. A total of 60 adult patients (ASA I–III), aged 18–70 years, will be randomized into two equal groups: one receiving TLIPB and the other ESPB using 0.25% bupivacaine (20 ml per side). Pain will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at predefined intervals. The time to first rescue analgesic and total number of rescue doses will be recorded. Statistical analysis will include t-tests, Mann-Whitney U, and chi-square tests. This study aims to identify the more effective block technique for optimizing postoperative pain control in spine surgeries.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
盲法
Participant and Investigator Blinded

入排标准

年龄范围
18.00 Year(s) 至 70.00 Year(s)(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • PATIENTS age between 18-70 years.
  • Patients belonging to ASA grade 1, 2 and 3 patients.
  • Patients undergoing thoracolumbar spine surgery.

排除标准

  • Patients age less than 18years and more tahn70 years
  • Patel belonging to ASA grade 4.

结局指标

主要结局

At the end of study we hope to ascertain the best

时间窗: 0 to 24 hours postoperatively

post operative analgesia among the two by comparing duration of analgesia.

时间窗: 0 to 24 hours postoperatively

次要结局

  • Postoperative pain score and total number of rescue analgesics(Vas score 1,2,6,12 and 24 hrs and rescue analgesics time points 0 to 24hrs)

研究者

发起方
SDM COLLEGE OF MEDICAL SCIENCE
申办方类型
Private medical college
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Dr Renuka GN

SDM COLLEGE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES AND HOSPITAL, DHARWAD

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验