An Intervention for Cardiac Arrest Survivors With Chronic Fatigue: A Feasibility Study
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 18
- 主要终点
- Number of participants who successfully identified and solved fatigue-related problems
研究概览
简要总结
The primary aim was to examine the feasibility of an Energy Conservation + Problem Solving Therapy (EC+PST) intervention delivered over the telephone and to evaluate the preliminary intervention effect on fatigue impact in daily activities in post-cardiac arrest (CA) adults with chronic fatigue.
详细描述
The primary aim was to examine the feasibility of recruiting and retaining participants for an Energy Conservation + Problem Solving Therapy (EC+PST) intervention delivered over the telephone, to evaluate the acceptability of the intervention, and to assess the appropriateness of the outcome measures. The secondary aim was to evaluate the preliminary intervention effect on fatigue impact, activity performance, and participation in daily activities in post-cardiac arrest (CA) adults with chronic fatigue.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Na
- 干预模型
- Single Group
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •At least 3 months post-cardiac arrest
- •Presence of moderate-to-severe fatigue: ≥ 4 score on the Fatigue Severity Scale
- •Availability of landline telephone or cell phone
- •Living within 150 miles of the University of Pittsburgh, Oakland
- •Functional English fluency and literacy
- •Intact cognition
- •Community living
排除标准
- 未提供
结局指标
主要结局
Number of participants who successfully identified and solved fatigue-related problems
时间窗: Week 5
Assessing the feasibility of telephone intervention delivery
Number of people who completed their study participation
时间窗: Week 5
Assessing the feasibility of recruitment and retention
Understanding of Materials Scale
时间窗: Week 5
* Assessing the clarity of the Participant Workbook and the acceptability of the intervention * Five-point scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree), and a total score ranging from 0 to 50, with higher scores indicating greater understanding of the workbook
Client Satisfaction Questionnaire - 8
时间窗: Week 5
* Assessing the participants' satisfaction and the acceptability of the intervention * Four-point scale ranging from 1 to 4, and a total score ranging from 8 - 32 with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction
次要结局
- Functional Activities Questionnaire(Week 0 and Week 5)
- Modified Fatigue Impact Scale(Week 0 and Week 5)
- Participation Objective, Participation Subjective (POPS)(Week 0 and Week 5)
- Fatigue Severity Scale(Week 0 and Week 5)
- Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Fatigue Scale(Week 0 and Week 5)
- Performance Assessment of Self-Care Skills - Self-report (PASS-SR)(Week 0 and Week 5)
研究者
Young J Kim
Research associate
University of Pittsburgh