Micro-invasive Methods of Mid-palatal Sutural Separation

Not Applicable

Not yet recruiting

• Conditions: Maxillary Expansion
• Interventions: Procedure: micro-osteoperforations ,microincision

• Registration Number: NCT05740592
• Lead Sponsor: University of Baghdad

Brief Summary

This trial aims to evaluate the effect of different micro-invasive methods (piezoelectric and micro-osteoperforation) along with tooth-tooth borne RPE compare to tooth-bone borne MARPE on the amount of mid-palatal sutural separation in late adolescent patients. Null Hypothesis There is no effect of adjunctive micro-invasive methods (piezoelectric and microosteoperforation) on mid-palatal suture separation with tooth-tooth borne RPE appliance compared to tooth-bone borne MARPE

Detailed Description

IMTD is commonly encountered in clinical practice and is treated using tooth-borne RME. Adult patients undergoing orthodontic treatment with tooth-borne RME frequently experience slight skeletal expansion, extrusion of posterior teeth, inability to open the palatal suture, and treatment relapse. Applying expansion forces directly to the midpalatal suture with bone-borne RME miniscrew implants is an alternative method. These bone-borne RME devices had more excellent orthopedic effects and fewer dentoalveolar side effects than their tooth-borne counterparts. Several factors, including the activation rate, influence the efficacy of RME residing in bone, such as the activation rate.

Clinical activation procedures for tooth-borne RME may not apply to bone-borne infections. As there is no existing consensus on standards for bone-borne RME, it is necessary to investigate expansion methods for these devices. In addition, the quality and amount of bone production rely on the rate of sutural growth, albeit to a lesser extent. A higher expansion rate has been related to increased sutural separation. However, the exact nature of this association and the most remarkable instantaneous expansion feasible without affecting sutural bone development have not been determined.

Using direct pressures with maximum instantaneous expansion to open mature midpalatal sutures can result in significant sutural stresses, and varied MTD is commonly observed clinically and controlled with tooth-borne RME. Adult patients undergoing orthodontic treatment with tooth-borne RME frequently experience slight skeletal expansion, extrusion of posterior teeth, inability to open the palatal suture, and treatment relapse. Applying expansion forces directly to the midpalatal suture with bone-borne RME miniscrew implants is an alternative method. These bone-borne RME appliances produced more robust orthopedic results and fewer dentoalveolar side effects than tooth-borne ones. Several parameters, including activation rate, influence the effectiveness ofbone-borne RME.

Clinical activation techniques for tooth-borne RME might not apply to bone-borne RME. As there is no current consensus on standards for bone-borne RME, expansion techniques for these devices require exploration. In addition, the rate of sutural expansion influences the quality and amount of bone production, albeit to a lesser extent. Although a faster expansion rate has been related to more significant sutural separation, the exact nature of this association and the most remarkable instantaneous expansion feasible without impairing sutural bone development have not been determined. Nonetheless, using direct forces with the maximal immediate expansion to open mature midpalatal sutures might result in substantial sutural strains and varying degrees of pain. SARME was utilized to assist transverse maxillary expansion in older individuals to alleviate high sutural tension and discomfort.

It has been discovered that the midpalatal suture offers the most resistance to maxillary expansion. For successful maxillary expansion in adult patients, it is necessary to overcome bone resistance at the midpalatal suture. Numerous techniques for simplifying, securing, and improving the predictability of surgical treatments for SARME, such as piezoelectric corticotomy, have been recently investigated. The latter dramatically minimises the traumatic side effects, surgical site bleeding, and procedure and healing time associated with conventional MARPE insertion techniques. During surgery, these instruments' precision enables the creation of precise, clean, and smooth geometries.

Consequently, several therapeutic applications of piezoelectric surgery in SARME and Le Fort I osteotomy and microosteoperforation with MARPE have been documented.

However, high-quality research, such as randomized clinical trials and prospective cohort studies with a well-defined appliance design and treatment protocol, is strongly encouraged to provide a higher level of evidence regarding the efficacy of rapid maxillary expansion in late-adolescent patients treated with minimally invasive techniques, such as MOPs and piezocision. However, no prior clinical trial has been conducted to examine the impact of different micro-invasive procedures on mid-palate sutural separation and rapid palatal extension in late adolescents.

Study Timeline

• Study First Submitted: 2022-09-21
• Study First Submitted QC: 2023-02-13
• Study First Posted: 2023-02-23
• Status Verified: 2023-03
• Last Update Submitted: 2023-03-06
• Last Update Posted: 2023-03-07
• Study Start: 2023-03-20
• Primary Completion: 2023-08-20
• Study Completion: 2023-08-20

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 27

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients with the bilateral maxillary transverse deficiency.
2. Patient referred by orthodontists for SARME or MARPE.
3. Patients with developmental age in stage C or stage D maturation stages .
4. Patients without developmental deformity.
5. Good oral hygiene.
6. Patient with intact maxillary first premolars and first molars.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Congenital maxillofacial deformities mainly cleft patients.
2. Previous orthodontic and surgical treatment on the maxilla.
3. Maxillary trauma.
4. Previous extraction in the maxillary arch.
5. Patients with periodontal disease.

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Tooth-Bone borne RPE group (MARPE)	micro-osteoperforations ,microincision	The MARPE is a RPE device with a rigid element that attached to palate by the aid of miniscrew, exerting the expansion force directly to the maxilla's basal bone
Tooth-Tooth borne RPE with Piezocision group	micro-osteoperforations ,microincision	Piezosurgery is an ultrasonic micro vibration-based bone cutting method. It used as a careful, promising, and soft tissue sparing method. In addition to its simplicity of use in the clinic, scientific evidence from animal models measuring wound healing and bone formation suggests that, piezosurgery has a better tissue response than traditional bone-cutting procedures .
tooth-tooth borne RPE with MOPs	micro-osteoperforations ,microincision	many approaches have been established to speed up orthodontic tooth movement and to decrease adverse effects. These methods are classified as, microinvasive methods include cortectomies and distraction osteogenesis and microinvasive methods include micro-osteoperforations (MOPs) and piezocision Microtrauma to the bone showed increase the synthesis of cytokines and chemokines, which are routinely released when orthodontic forces are applied . As a result, the affected area is undergoing a faster bone regeneration process

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
CBCT Outcomes	T2:6 months after expansion.	In all groups, CBCT scans will be taken before expansion , immediately after completion of the consolidation period (3month), and 6 month after placement; NFW4: Nasal floor width measured at the area of the first premolars, 5 mm above the most inferior part of the nasal floor. NFW6: Nasal floor width measured at the area of the first molars,5 mm above the most inferior part of the nasal floor. PBW4: Palatal bone width measured at the level of a line connecting the palatal root apex of the first premolars. PBW6: Palatal bone width measured at the level of a line connecting the palatal root apex of the first molars. IRD4 (Interdental Root Distance 4): The distance between the palatal root apex of the right and left first premolars. IRD6 (Interdental Root Distance 6): The distance between the palatal root apex of the right and left first molars. ICD4 (Interdental Cusp Distance 4): The distance between the mesiopalatal cusp tip of the right and left first premolars
Intraoral scanner outcomes	T2: 6 months after expansion	the use of an intraoral scanner RW1: The arch width defines as the distance in a straight line between the palatal cusp tip of the right and left first premolars. RW2: The arch width defines as the distance in a straight line between the mesiopalatal cusp tip of the right and left first molars. PV: The palatal vault height defines as the vertical distance from the occlusal plane to the median line of the palate in the position connecting the mesiodistal center of the left and right first molars. To assess the inter and intra reliability the arch width and palatal vault height of each patient will be measured three times.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Treatment duration	T2: 3 months after expansion	The time from fixation to removal (time to event) will be recorded. The expansion rate, which can be calculated as the amount of expansion divided by the total number of follow-up periods for all participants, will be reported.
Periodontal health	T2:6 months after expansion.	The impact of the therapy on periodontal health and supporting structures. For premolars and molars, the gingival index, probing depths, and bleeding on probing will be among the criteria, CBCT will be used to determine the extent of buccal bone resorption.
Soft tissue impaction	T2:6 months after expansion.	Soft tissue impaction will be the third secondary outcome, which will be measured by extraoral scaner to perioral soft tissue three months following the retention period.