跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT00676000
NCT00676000撤回不适用

Randomized Trial of Interrupted Versus Continuous Vaginal Closure of Anterior Repair With Mesh

Brigham and Women's Hospital0 个研究点目标入组 350 人开始时间: 2008年4月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
撤回
入组人数
350
主要终点
Mesh exposure

研究概览

简要总结

Vaginal prolapse is a common condition that is treated with surgical correction. Recently surgeons have been using mesh to augment the repair of vaginal prolapse. Common complications of this surgery include vaginal pain, pain during sex, infection or erosion of the mesh in the vagina. There are different ways to close the vaginal wall over the mesh used in these procedures. Currently, there is no accepted standard method of closing the vaginal wall. The purpose of this study is to find out the best way to close the surgical wound in the vagina. We will compare interrupted closure (separate stitches) to continuous closure (one long, running stitch). We hope to show in our study that one method of closure is better than the other.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
Female
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Scheduled for surgery to correct anterior vaginal prolapse with mesh kit

排除标准

  • 未提供

结局指标

主要结局

Mesh exposure

时间窗: One year

次要结局

  • Pain(One year)
  • Dyspareunia(One year)

研究者

申办方类型
Other

相似试验

Randomized Trial of Interrupted Versus Continuous... | 临床试验