Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT00676000
NCT00676000
Withdrawn
N/A

Randomized Trial of Interrupted Versus Continuous Vaginal Closure of Anterior Repair With Mesh

Brigham and Women's Hospital0 sites350 target enrollmentApril 2008

Overview

Phase
N/A
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Pain
Sponsor
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Enrollment
350
Primary Endpoint
Mesh exposure
Status
Withdrawn
Last Updated
17 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

Vaginal prolapse is a common condition that is treated with surgical correction. Recently surgeons have been using mesh to augment the repair of vaginal prolapse. Common complications of this surgery include vaginal pain, pain during sex, infection or erosion of the mesh in the vagina. There are different ways to close the vaginal wall over the mesh used in these procedures. Currently, there is no accepted standard method of closing the vaginal wall. The purpose of this study is to find out the best way to close the surgical wound in the vagina. We will compare interrupted closure (separate stitches) to continuous closure (one long, running stitch). We hope to show in our study that one method of closure is better than the other.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
April 2008
End Date
December 2009
Last Updated
17 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
Female

Investigators

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Scheduled for surgery to correct anterior vaginal prolapse with mesh kit

Exclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Mesh exposure

Time Frame: One year

Secondary Outcomes

  • Pain(One year)
  • Dyspareunia(One year)

Similar Trials