跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01085279
NCT01085279已完成2 期

Non-ablative 1,550 nm Fractional Laser Therapy Versus Triple Topical Therapy for the Treatment of Melasma: a Randomized Controlled Split-face Study

Netherlands Institute for Pigment Disorders1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 29 人开始时间: 2009年3月最近更新:
适应症
干预措施
相关药物

试验速览

阶段
2 期
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
29
试验地点
1
主要终点
Physician's global assessment

研究概览

简要总结

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the use of non-ablative fractional laser is safe and effective in the treatment of melasma.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Single (Investigator)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Subjects attending the outpatient department of the Netherlands Institute for Pigment Disorders
  • Age at least 18 years
  • Subject is willing and able to give written informed consent

排除标准

  • use of bleaching creams during the past six weeks
  • history of keloid
  • active eczema
  • suspected hypersensitivity to lidocaine or triple therapy
  • use of isotretinoin in the past six months
  • high exposure of the lesion to sunlight or UV light (UVA or UVB).

研究组 & 干预措施

Non-ablative fractional laser

Experimental

In each patient, one side of the face was treated with non-ablative fractional laser in four-five sessions.

Note: this study had a split-face design. In each patient, each side of the face was randomized to receive either non-ablative fractional laser therapy or triple topical therapy.

干预措施: Fraxel Restore, Solta Medical Inc. (Non-ablative fractional laser) (Device)

Triple topical therapy

Active Comparator

In each patient, one side of the face was treated with triple topical therapy (Hydroquinone 5%, tretinoin 0.05%, triamcinolone acetonide 0.1%) during 15 weeks.

Note: this study had a split-face design. In each patient, each side of the face was randomized to receive either non-ablative fractional laser therapy or triple topical therapy.

干预措施: Modified Kligman's formula (Triple topical therapy) (Drug)

结局指标

主要结局

Physician's global assessment

时间窗: T0, 3 weeks, and 3 and 6 months follow-up

Improvement of hyperpigmentation was assessed by an independent blinded dermatologist. The results were scored on a scale from zero to six (0: total clearance (100% improvement), 1: almost total clearance (90-99% improvement), 2: distinct clearance (75-89% improvement) 3: moderate clearance (50-74% improvement) 4: mild clearance (25-49% improvement) 5: no change, 6: worsening of hyperpigmentation).

次要结局

  • L-value(T0, 3 weeks and 3 and 6 months follow-up)
  • Melanin index(T0, 3 weeks and 3, and 6 months follow-up)
  • Patient's global assessment(3 weeks, 3 and 6 months follow-up)
  • Patient's satisfaction(3 weeks, 3 and 6 months follow-up)

研究者

发起方
Netherlands Institute for Pigment Disorders
申办方类型
Other

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验