MedPath

Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) in Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders

Phase 4
Completed
Conditions
Schizophrenia
Registration Number
NCT01081418
Lead Sponsor
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Brief Summary

The study examined the 12-month effectiveness of continuous therapeutic assertive community treatment (ACT) as part of integrated care (IC) compared to standard care (SC) in a catchment area comparison design in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD) treated with quetiapine IR.

Detailed Description

Two catchment areas in Hamburg, Germany with similar population size and health care structures were assigned to offer 12-month ACT (\& IC; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf) or SC (Asklepios Hospital, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy) to 120 first-episode and negatively selected multiple-episode patients with SSD. Primary outcome was the time to Service Disengagement. Secondary outcomes comprised medication non-adherence, improvements of symptoms, functioning, quality of life, satisfaction with care from patients and relatives perspectives, and service use data.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
120
Inclusion Criteria
  • Age 18-65 years
  • Met the diagnostic criteria of a first- or multiple episode of a schizophrenia spectrum disorders, i.e. schizophrenia, schizophreniform disorder, schizoaffective disorder, delusional disorder, or psychotic disorder NOS
  • New initiation or current treatment with quetiapine Immediate Release (IR)
Exclusion Criteria
  • Other psychotic disorders (e.g., due to medical condition)
  • Mental retardation (IQ lower than 70 points)

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Time to Service Disengagement12 months

The primary outcome of the study was the time to service disengagement (SD). This primary aim was chosen because the assertive approach of ACT is to prevent service disengagement3 and because service disengagement is a major predictor for relapse and thereby poor long-term outcome.16,17 Service disengagement was present, if a patient repeatedly refuses further treatment despite several attempts of reengagement (phone calls of patient and family in both treatment arms and potentially home visits in the ACT group).

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Improvements of symptoms, functioning, quality of life, and satisfaction with care from patients and relatives perspectives12 months

Secondary outcomes comprised medication non-adherence, improvements of symptoms, functioning, quality of life, and satisfaction with care from patients and relatives perspectives.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University Medical Center Hamburg

🇩🇪

Hamburg, Germany

University Medical Center Hamburg
🇩🇪Hamburg, Germany

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.