MedPath

'Smart Reminder': a Feasibility Pilot Study on the Effects of a Wearable Device Treatment

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Stroke
Interventions
Device: Wearable device -'Smart Reminder'
Other: Conventional therapy
Registration Number
NCT05878132
Lead Sponsor
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Brief Summary

This pilot study examines the feasibility and potential effects on upper limb (UL) motor function using a wearable device integrated with a telerehabilitation function in the home setting with chronic stroke survivors.

The study seeks to address the question:

- Is wearable device intervention more effective in promoting arm recovery in stroke survivors than conventional therapy for home-based training? We hypothesize that using a multimodal feedback system in the wearable device can provide more effective training to improve the hemiplegic UL function of chronic stroke survivors than conventional therapy.

This is a single-blinded randomized crossover pilot trial. Twelve participants will be randomly assigned into two groups: the experimental (wristwatch) and the control (conventional therapy) groups. Participants in the experimental group will undergo a 4-week wearable device treatment followed by a 4-week conventional training.

Participants in the control group will complete conventional therapy and then wearable device treatment. There will be a 3-week washout period between treatments. Upper limb motor outcome measures will be evaluated at the following intervals: baseline, post-treatment at 4-week, after a 3-week washout period for pre-intervention, and post-intervention after crossover by research assistants blinded to group allocation.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
12
Inclusion Criteria
  • age ≥ 18 years
  • unilateral hemispherical involvement
  • diagnosis of stroke with onset ≥ three months
  • hemiplegic upper limb with Functional test for hemiplegic upper extremity-Hong Kong version (FTHUE-HK) ≥ score of 3 (maximum of 7) (Fong et al., 2004).
  • no complaint of excessive pain and swelling over the hemiplegic arm
  • able to provide informed consent to participate.
Exclusion Criteria
  • participating in another similar form of experimental study during the same period
  • having a history of botulinum toxin injection in the past three months
  • having other significant upper limb impairment, i.e. fixed contractures, frozen shoulder, and severe arthritis
  • having a diagnosis which would interfere in the use of the device, i.e. visual impairment, active cardiac issues and palliative treatment.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Wearable device groupWearable device -'Smart Reminder'Participants in the experimental group will be instructed to wear the wristwatch device five days per week for a minimum of 3 hours per day and engage in telerehabilitation, 1hour per day for 5 times per week over 4 weeks. Weekly, there will be a 30-minute therapy consultation.
Conventional therapy groupConventional therapyThe participants in the conventional group will receive similar in-home upper limb exercises as the wearable device group, with the prescribed exercises presented in the form of a pictorial handout rather than an in-app video. They are instructed to perform the exercises 1hour per day, 5times per week over 4 weeks. Weekly, there will be a 30-minute therapy consultation.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change from baseline Motor Activity Log (MAL)Change from baseline at 4 weeks

The MAL is a self-reported questionnaire designed to assess how frequently and effectively patients utilize their affected arm daily. It consists of 2 subscales to measure patients' perceived amount of arm use (MAL-AOU) and quality of arm use (MAL-QOM) (Uswatte, Taub, Morris, Light \& Thompson, 2006)

Change from preintervention at 7-week (after crossover) Active range of motion (AROM) of shoulder and elbowChange from 7-week at 11 weeks

The active ROM of the shoulder (flexion) and elbow (flexion/ extension) will be evaluated using a manual goniometer.

Change from preintervention at 7-week (after crossover) Motor Activity Log (MAL)Change from 7-week at 11 weeks

The MAL is a self-reported questionnaire designed to assess how frequently and effectively patients utilize their affected arm daily. It consists of 2 subscales to measure patients' perceived amount of arm use (MAL-AOU) and quality of arm use (MAL-QOM) (Uswatte, Taub, Morris, Light \& Thompson, 2006)

Change from baseline Fugl Meyer Upper Extremity assessmentChange from baseline at 4 weeks

The FMA-UE is a 3-point scale with a maximum score of 66 that measures the synergistic pattern and ability to make arm movements.The total score is further subdivided into upper-extremity and hand subscores with a total score of 66 (Fugl Meyer et al., 1975)

Change from baseline Action Research Arm TestChange from baseline at 4 weeks

The ARAT is a frequently used assessment tool to assess hemiplegic upper limb function. It consists of 19 items comprising four domains: grasp, grip, pinch, and gross motor, and has a total score of 57 (Lyle, 1981).

Change from preintervention at 7-week (after crossover) Action Research Arm TestChange from 7-week at 11 weeks

The ARAT is a frequently used assessment tool to assess hemiplegic upper limb function. It consists of 19 items comprising four domains: grasp, grip, pinch, and gross motor, and has a total score of 57 (Lyle, 1981).

Change from baseline Active range of motion (AROM) of shoulder and elbowChange from baseline at 4 weeks

The active ROM of the shoulder (flexion) and elbow (flexion/ extension) will be evaluated using a manual goniometer.

Change from preintervention at 7-week (after crossover) Fugl Meyer Upper Extremity assessmentChange from 7-week at 11 weeks

The FMA-UE is a 3-point scale with a maximum score of 66 that measures the synergistic pattern and ability to make arm movements.The total score is further subdivided into upper-extremity and hand subscores with a total score of 66 (Fugl Meyer et al., 1975)

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Kenneth FONG

🇭🇰

Hong Kong, Hong Kong

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath