NCT00568269已完成不适用
Randomized Multicentre Study Comparing TEP With Lichtenstein Repair for Primary Inguinal Hernia
适应症
干预措施
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 1,513
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Recurrence rate
研究概览
简要总结
The purpose of this study was to compare the recurrence rate after TEP (laparoscopic method) and Lichtenstein (open method) repair on primary inguinal hernia.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 30 Years 至 70 Years（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- Male
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Age 30-70 years referred to hospital with a primary inguinal hernia.
排除标准
- •Recurrent hernia
- •Scrotal or bilateral hernia
- •Previous lower abdominal surgery
- •Unable to participate in follow up
- •ASA more than 3
- •Bleeding diathesis.
研究组 & 干预措施
Lichtenstein
Active Comparator
干预措施: Open repair (Procedure)
TEP
Experimental
干预措施: Laparoscopic repair (Procedure)
结局指标
主要结局
Recurrence rate
时间窗: 5 years
次要结局
- Operative complications, postoperative recovery and chronic pain at 5 years.(5 years)
研究者
研究点 (1)
Loading locations...
相似试验
终止
不适用
Laparoscopic or Conventional Mesh Repair of Incisional and Umbilical HerniaIncisional HerniaUmbilical HerniaNCT00970515Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris98
已完成
不适用
Clinical Trial Comparing Open and Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication in ChildrenGastroesophageal RefluxNCT00382850Johns Hopkins University68
Unknown
不适用
Conventional Laparoscopic APR Versus Laparoscopic APR With Transabdominal Individualized Levator TransectionRectal CancerNCT02812628Ruijin Hospital528
终止
4 期
Randomized Study Designed to Look at Disease Progression Using 2 Currently FDA Approved Drugs for the Treatment of RRMSRelapsing Remitting Multiple SclerosisNCT00202995Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.91
Unknown
不适用
Comparison of Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer:A Prospective Randomized TrialStomach NeoplasmLaparoscopyGastrectomyComplicationsNCT01043835Yan Shi328