MedPath

A Study to Assess Wound Healing Efficacies of Different Adhesive Bandages

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Wound Healing
Interventions
Device: Marketed Bandage #2
Device: Non-Marketed Adhesive Bandage #4
Device: Marketed Adhesive Bandage #1
Device: Non-Marketed Bandage #1
Device: Non-Marketed Bandage #2
Device: Non-Marketed Adhesive Bandage #3
Device: Non-Marketed Adhesive Bandage #5
Registration Number
NCT04040933
Lead Sponsor
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. (J&JCI)
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the wound healing efficacy (time to complete healing) of different adhesive bandages.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
36
Inclusion Criteria
  • Fitzpatrick Skin Type II or III
  • Uniform skin color on both volar forearms
  • Generally in good health based on medical history reported by the participant
  • -Individual has signed the Photographic Release and Informed Consent Documents along with (HIPAA) disclosure
  • Willing to have temporary (semi-permanent) dot-tattoos applied to the volar forearms
Exclusion Criteria
  • Has known allergies, hypersensitivity, or adverse reactions to anesthetics, adhesive bandages, latex, wound treatment products, or any component/ingredient present in the Investigational Products (IPs)/auxiliary/ancillary products
  • Has a known history of a blood-clotting disorder, keloid formation, or a cardiovascular, hepatic, or renal disease
  • Presents with a skin condition that would, in the opinion of the PI or Study Physician, confound study results, increase risk to participant, or interfere with study evaluations
  • Has excessive hair or tattoos on either volar forearm
  • Has a known history of severe systemic immune system disorders
  • Has self-reported Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes
  • Has self-reported uncontrolled chronic diseases
  • Is taking medication that would mask an adverse event, confound study results or alter/compromise the bleeding/healing process
  • Is self-reported to be pregnant or planning to become pregnant
  • Has a body mass index (BMI) above 35
  • Is self-reported to be an alcohol or drug abuser
  • Has participated in another clinical trial within 10 days
  • Either is or lives with someone who is a current employee of any company that makes/markets adhesive bandages or first-aid products

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Marketed Adhesive Bandage #2Marketed Bandage #2Minor wounds will be created on participant's forearms (four per arm) by a certified laser specialist. On the randomized wound site, bandage will be applied. This adhesive bandage will be changed only on Days 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, and 16 and all wound sites will be uncovered from Day 16 to Day 28 for assessments.
Non-marketed Adhesive Bandage #4Non-Marketed Adhesive Bandage #4Minor wounds will be created on participant's forearms (four per arm) by a certified laser specialist. On the randomized wound site, bandage will be applied. This adhesive bandage will be changed daily from Day 1 through Day 16 and all wound sites will be uncovered from Day 16 to Day 28 for assessments.
Marketed Adhesive Bandage #1Marketed Adhesive Bandage #1Minor wounds will be created on participant's forearms (four per arm) by a certified laser specialist. On the randomized wound site, bandage will be applied. This adhesive bandage will be changed daily from Day 1 through Day 16 and all wound sites will be uncovered from Day 16 to Day 28 for assessments.
Non-marketed Adhesive Bandage #1Non-Marketed Bandage #1Minor wounds will be created on participant's forearms (four per arm) by a certified laser specialist. On the randomized wound site, bandage will be applied. This adhesive bandage will be changed daily from Day 1 through Day 16 and all wound sites will be uncovered from Day 16 to Day 28 for assessments.
Non-marketed Adhesive Bandage #2Non-Marketed Bandage #2Minor wounds will be created on participant's forearms (four per arm) by a certified laser specialist. On the randomized wound site, bandage will be applied. This adhesive bandage will be changed daily from Day 1 through Day 16 and all wound sites will be uncovered from Day 16 to Day 28 for assessments.
Non-marketed Adhesive Bandage #3Non-Marketed Adhesive Bandage #3Minor wounds will be created on participant's forearms (four per arm) by a certified laser specialist. On the randomized wound site, bandage will be applied. This adhesive bandage will be changed daily from Day 1 through Day 16 and all wound sites will be uncovered from Day 16 to Day 28 for assessments.
Non-marketed Adhesive Bandage #5Non-Marketed Adhesive Bandage #5Minor wounds will be created on participant's forearms (four per arm) by a certified laser specialist. On the randomized wound site, bandage will be applied. This adhesive bandage will be changed daily from Day 1 through Day 16 and all wound sites will be uncovered from Day 16 to Day 28 for assessments.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Time to Complete Wound HealingUp to Day 16

Time to complete wound healing: time(in days) elapsed from time of wound creation to 12 PM of day (up to Day 16) on which composite healing score(CHS) first meets complete healing criterion of being at least a score of 8 (threshold for complete healing). CHS was calculated from clinical grading of wound healing parameters as general wound appearance (0 \[Poor-New or fresh wound with epithelium layer missing, wound bed appears raw and possibly oozing\] to 4 \[Excellent-Fully healed, skin flush against surrounding skin, slight color mismatch may be present\])+smoothness (0 \[Rough, uneven wound\]- 4 \[complete smoothness, even wound\])+epithelial confluence (0 \[None\]- 4 \[91-100%full epithelial growth\]) - erythema (0 \[None\]- 4 \[Severe\]) - edema (0 \[None\]- 4 \[Severe\]) - crusting/scabbing (0 \[None\]- 4 \[90-100% crusting/scabbing\]). CHS on 25-point scale (-12 \[no healing\] to +12 \[towards healing\]) is indicative of extent of wound healing and was calculated for each wound site at each evaluation day.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change From Baseline in Clinical Grading of Wound Healing Parameter - ErythemaDay 0 (immediate after wound creation), Day 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16

Change from baseline in Clinical grading of wound healing parameter (erythema) was evaluated on a scale of 0 (no erythema) to 4 (severe erythema).

Change From Baseline in Painful Score With Arm Resting by SideBaseline, Day 1, 2, 3 and 4

Change from baseline in painful score based on participants self-assessment questionnaire score (question 1) was reported. Participants were asked to rate each wound for pain/soreness in resting position as score from 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain).

Change From Baseline in Trans-Epidermal Water Loss (TEWL) MeasurementsDay 0 (immediate after wound creation), Day 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14

Change from Baseline in TEWL was reported. TEWL is the passive transfer of water through stratum corneum and was measured for each wound site using Tewameter TM330T. TEWL is a non-invasive method to measure the integrity of stratum corneum barrier function. Tewameter probe measures the density gradient of the water evaporation from the skin indirectly by two pairs of sensors (temperature and relative humidity) inside a hollow cylinder. The probe was held in place on the skin for one measurement, for 40 sec, to ensure that a stable value has been established. The values of the last 10 sec are averaged as the actual measurement values. An increase in TEWL values shows damage to the skin barrier function.

Change From Baseline in Clinical Grading of Wound Healing Parameter - EdemaDay 0 (immediate after wound creation), Day 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16

Change from baseline in Clinical grading of wound healing parameter (edema) was evaluated on a scale of 0 (no edema) to 4 (severe edema).

Change From Baseline in Composite Scar ScoreBaseline and Day 28

Change from baseline in composite scar score was reported. It was calculated as the sum of the individual parameters on the Manchester Scar Scale (Color ranges 1 \[perfect\] to 4 \[gross mismatch\]), Finish ranges 1 \[matte\] to 2 \[shiny\], Contour ranges 1 \[Flush with surrounding skin\] to 4 \[keloid\], Distortion ranges 1 \[none\] to 4 \[severe\] and Texture ranges 1 \[normal\] to 4 \[hard\]). Composite Scar Scores range from 5 to 18, with 5 representing clinically best scars and 18 representing clinically worst scars.

Change From Baseline in Itchy ScoreBaseline, Day 1, 2, 3 and 4

Change from baseline in itchy score based on participants self-assessment questionnaire score (question 5) was reported. Participants were asked to rate each wound for itchiness as score from 0 (no itch) to 10 (severe itch).

Change From Baseline in Painful Score With Arm in Normal MotionBaseline, Day 1, 2, 3 and 4

Change from baseline in Painful Score based on participants self-assessment questionnaire score (question 3) was reported. Participants were asked to rate each wound for pain/soreness in normal position as score from 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain).

Number of Participants With Pain Duration With Arm Resting by SideDay 1, 2, 3 and 4

Participants were asked to rate the pain as either brief, periodic, or constant in arm resting position with the Self-Assessment Questionnaire (question 2). Number of participants with pain duration (brief, periodic, or constant) with arm resting by side was reported.

Number of Participants With Pain Duration With Arm in Normal MotionDay 1, 2, 3 and 4

Participants were asked to rate the pain as either brief, periodic, or constant in arm normal motion with the Self-Assessment Questionnaire (question 4). Number of participants with pain duration (brief, periodic, or constant) with arm in normal motion was reported.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Thomas J. Stephens

🇺🇸

Richardson, Texas, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath