Immediate Versus Delayed Loading for Implants Retaining Mandibular Complete Overdenture
- Conditions
- Bone LossDental Implant
- Interventions
- Other: Immediate loading of the implantsOther: Delayed loading of the implant
- Registration Number
- NCT05620797
- Lead Sponsor
- Hams Hamed Abdelrahman
- Brief Summary
The aim of this study will be to compare the amount of marginal bone height changes between immediate and delayed loading for immediately inserted implants used as abutments of mandibular overdenture.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 14
- Patient having two standing mandibular canines with compromised prognosis (which indicted for extraction, without any preapical lesions nor acute infection) and have an adequate labial bone thickness.
- Patient having opposing completely edenteolous maxilla.
- Patients having normal maxilla-mandibular relationship and sufficient inter arch distance was insured by through tentative jaw relation record.
- Patients with good oral hygiene.
- Enough bone volume for implants in the interforaminal region (adequate bone quality and quantity)
- Mental disorder patients who are not capable of making a decision or narcotic drug addicts.
- Patients with Tempro-Mandibular Joint disorders
- Patients undergoing radiotherapy or chemotherapy
- Patients with systemic diseases affecting bone metabolism
- Uncooperative patients who have no understanding of the need of a regular follow-up.
- Patient with pathological defects in the areas of implant insertion.
- Vulnerable group as prisoners, mentally retarded patients.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Immediate loading implants Immediate loading of the implants - Delayed loading implants Delayed loading of the implant -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in bone loss at 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months Every 3 months all patients were recalled for assessment of marginal bone loss. The assessment was done using digital periapical radiograph Ezsensor (Vatech intraoral radiographic sensor, Vatech, South Korea) and the technique of radiograph was paralleling technique using sensor holder (TROLLBYTE PLUS, TROLLDENTAL, UK) to ensure same position of cone through subsequent follow-up exposures
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Ain Shams Faculty of Dentistry
🇪🇬Cairo, Egypt