Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05777395
NCT05777395
Active, not recruiting
Not Applicable

Comparison of Maitland Oscillatory Mobilizations With Kaltenborn Sustained Stretch Mobilizations in Cervicogenic Headache Patients

Foundation University Islamabad1 site in 1 country26 target enrollmentJanuary 1, 2023

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Cervicogenic Headache
Sponsor
Foundation University Islamabad
Enrollment
26
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Pain intensity
Status
Active, not recruiting
Last Updated
3 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

Cervicogenic headache is a common headache that causes disability and affects everyday activities. Headache related disorders are the second most common reason for years lived with disability all over the world. According to the latest International Headache Society model, cervicogenicheadache (CGH) is a secondary headache having C1-C2 dysfunction. There is marked limitation in cervical ROM specially rotation. Treatment indicated involves use of electrotherapy and thermal modalities. In addition, use of different manual therapy techniques are advocated to eliminate the root cause i.e. C1-C2 dysfunction. Maitland mobilizations for cervical spine have been found to be effective in treating CGH patients. Maitland mobilizations uses oscillatory mobilizations and has four grades. Kaltenborn, on the other hand, applies sustained stretches and has 3 grades.So, the study will be focusing on comparing the effectiveness of these two mobilizations on cervicogenic headache patients.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
January 1, 2023
End Date
July 1, 2023
Last Updated
3 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age 18-45 years
  • Both males and females
  • Unilateral headache with no shift of side
  • C1-C2 dysfunction
  • Headache with neck stiffness
  • Headache at least once a month in the last 3 months
  • Positive flexion rotation test (Rotation restriction is greater than 10 degrees)
  • Headache with a score of at least 4 in the Numeric pain rating scale

Exclusion Criteria

  • Cervical spondylosis
  • Headache of non-cervical origin
  • Dizziness or visual disturbance
  • Cervical radiculopathy/ nerve root involvement/ disc herniation
  • Cervical instability/ fracture
  • Vertebrobasilar insufficiency
  • Thoracic outlet syndrome
  • Cervical spine surgery
  • Cervical spondylolisthesis
  • Spinal infection or tumors

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Pain intensity

Time Frame: 2 weeks

Pain will be measured on the basis of Numeric Pain Rating Scale score.

Cervical range of motion

Time Frame: 2 weeks

Cervical rotation will be measured through CROM device

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials