Transvaginal Versus Transobturator Paravaginal Repair
Not Applicable
Completed
- Conditions
- Cystocele
- Registration Number
- NCT03489902
- Lead Sponsor
- Ain Shams Maternity Hospital
- Brief Summary
Clinical trial comparing the new technique for paravaginal repair versus the traditional technique
- Detailed Description
trial comparing the transobturator paravaginal repair versus the traditional technique
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- Female
- Target Recruitment
- 40
Inclusion Criteria
paravaginal defect cystocele
midline and paravaginal defect cystocele
Exclusion Criteria
- uterine descent previous cystocele surgery
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Operative data 1 day Operative time
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Operative Details 1 day blood loss
Pelvic organ prolapse quantification system 3 month Evaluation of the postoperative degree of anterior vaginal wall descent
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
What molecular pathways are involved in tissue healing after transobturator versus transvaginal paravaginal repair for cystocele?
How does transobturator paravaginal repair compare to traditional transvaginal repair in NCT03489902 for cystocele recurrence and patient outcomes?
Which biomarkers predict optimal outcomes for transobturator or transvaginal paravaginal repair in pelvic organ prolapse patients?
What are the adverse event profiles and management strategies for transobturator versus transvaginal paravaginal repair techniques?
Are there alternative surgical approaches or materials used in paravaginal repair for cystocele compared to NCT03489902 methods?