Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03045835
NCT03045835
Completed
Not Applicable

Baska ® Mask Versus Endotracheal Tube in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy : A Prospective Randomized Trial

University of Malaya1 site in 1 country60 target enrollmentMarch 1, 2017

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Laparoscopic Surgery
Sponsor
University of Malaya
Enrollment
60
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Time to effective airway insertion
Status
Completed
Last Updated
5 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

Baska mask is a new novel supraglottic airway device with many salient features. The investigators aim to determine the benefit of BASKA mask as an effective airway device for laparoscopic surgery, and whether it can even substitute endotracheal intubation, in order to smoothen the surgery and anaesthesia process as well as reduce perioperative complications.

Detailed Description

Patient's satisfaction and smooth process is crucial for perioperative care.Conduct of Anaesthesia including choice of airway devices play an important role. Endotracheal intubation has long been regarded as the technique of choice for airway management in laparoscopic surgery. However, there is currently an emerging interest in laryngeal mask as the substitute for endotracheal tube in laparoscopic surgery. The increased abdominal pressure secondary to gas insufflation in Laparoscopic surgery demands a good supraglottic airway device with features of good seal, aspiration prevention and effective ventilation. Few studies have evaluated the performance Baska® Mask for various type of surgery and had obtained high "first-attempt" success rate, easy insertion and a good oropharyngeal leak pressure above 30cmH2O with low complications such as sorethroat, dysphonia and dysphagia. However, study regarding comparison of Baska® mask with endotracheal tube has not been carried out before. Therefore, the investigators would like to evaluate this novel device in comparison with endotracheal tube for laparoscopic surgery in our centre. This will be a prospective randomized controlled study in University Malaya Medical Centre to compare Baska® mask with the conventional laryngoscope-guided endotracheal intubation for laparoscopic surgeries. The investigators would like to study the efficacy of this device in term of : time to effective airway insertion, efficacy of airway seal, post-operation device of complications.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
March 1, 2017
End Date
March 31, 2019
Last Updated
5 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Ng Ching Choe

MD, MMED (Anaes)

University of Malaya

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age 18 to 75 years old
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I and II BMI ≤ 35
  • Laparoscopic cholecystectomy only

Exclusion Criteria

  • Known gastroesophageal reflux
  • History of difficult intubation or difficult anaesthesia
  • Features of facial, laryngeal and pharyngeal anatomy problem

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Time to effective airway insertion

Time Frame: 1 hour

defined as time from picking up the airway device (either BASKA mask or Endotracheal tube), insertion and until occurrence of the first square-waveform capnogram

Secondary Outcomes

  • Gastric distension scoring by surgeon(during operative duration)
  • Post operation incidence of complications(from the induction of anaesthesia, until at the postanaesthetic care unit (PACU), assessed up to 24 hours)
  • Numbers of attempt of airway device insertion and Ease of insertion(1 hour)
  • Hemodynamic changes(after induction of anaesthesia at 1, 2, 3,4,5,10,20,30 minutes; then post extubation at 1 ,2,3,4,5 minutes)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials