MedPath

Sagittal Plane Correction With Pass-LP Device in Adult Deformity Patients

Completed
Conditions
Lumbar or Thoraco-lumbar Adult Deformity
Interventions
Device: Polyaxial posterior spinal fusion system
Registration Number
NCT01635322
Lead Sponsor
Medicrea International
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the correlation between the restoration of the sagittal balance and the improvement of the Quality of Life for patients with adult scoliosis, treated with a polyaxial system (PASS® LP system) during the 2 years after a spinal fusion surgery.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
54
Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Lumbar or thoraco-lumbar Adult DeformityPolyaxial posterior spinal fusion systemLumbar or thoraco-lumbar Adult Deformity
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Correlation between correction of SVA and improvement ODIpreop, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months

The primary objective is to evaluate the correlation between:

* the correction of the Sagittal Vertical Alignement (SVA), expressed in centimeters - SVA is the distance between C7 plumbline and the posterior of the superior endplate of S1)

* the improvement of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is the positive difference of the preoperative score and the postoperative score - expressed in % or a score (/50)

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Adjacent levels degenerationpreop, 24 months

preoperative and post-operative comparison of the disc height of the upper and lower adjacent levels

Fusionpreop, 24 months

standing X-Rays observations (osseous formation)

Complications associated with the devicepreop, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months

Per and Post-operative device complications:

Screw pull-out Loosening, breakage and pseudarthrosis based on x-rays analysis

Complications associated with the surgerypreop, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months

Peri-operative data: length of operative time, length of correction time, blood loss ... Surgical complications

Coronal correctionpreop, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months

* A pre/post-operative comparison of regular Cobb angles

* A pre/post-operative comparison of C7 plumb line (Coronal balance)

* A pre/post-operative comparison of Apical Vertebra Translation (AVT)

Correction of the sagittal parameterspreop, 24 months

Sagittal parameters are evaluated by:

- Cobb angle: Thoracic kyphosis measured from T5 to T12 and between the 2 inflexion points of the curve Lumbar lordosis measured from T12 to S1 and between the 2 inflexion points of the curve

* Pelvic Incidence (PI)

* Pelvic Tilt (PT)

* Sacral Slope (SS)

* Proximal junction Cobb angle

* T1 spinopelvic inclination (T1-SPI)

improvement of Quality of lifepreop, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months

* The effect that the patient's pathology has on his/her daily life evaluated by the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS-22) questionnaire designed and recommended by the Scoliosis Research Society

* Pain reduction for back and leg by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

* Patient satisfaction with the results of their operation using a simple questionnaire (Patient Satisfaction Index - PSI) which was designed and recommended by the North American Spine Society (NASS)

Vertebra rotationpreop, 24 months

* A pre/post-operative comparison of Rotary Vertebra Subluxation (olisthesis)

* A pre/post-operative comparison of Apical Vertebra Rotation (AVR) - Nash Moe

Trial Locations

Locations (2)

UC Denver

🇺🇸

Denver, Colorado, United States

Santy orthopedic center

🇫🇷

Lyon, France

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath