Sagittal Plane Correction With Pass-LP Device in Adult Deformity Patients
- Conditions
- Lumbar or Thoraco-lumbar Adult Deformity
- Interventions
- Device: Polyaxial posterior spinal fusion system
- Registration Number
- NCT01635322
- Lead Sponsor
- Medicrea International
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the correlation between the restoration of the sagittal balance and the improvement of the Quality of Life for patients with adult scoliosis, treated with a polyaxial system (PASS® LP system) during the 2 years after a spinal fusion surgery.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 54
Not provided
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Lumbar or thoraco-lumbar Adult Deformity Polyaxial posterior spinal fusion system Lumbar or thoraco-lumbar Adult Deformity
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Correlation between correction of SVA and improvement ODI preop, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months The primary objective is to evaluate the correlation between:
* the correction of the Sagittal Vertical Alignement (SVA), expressed in centimeters - SVA is the distance between C7 plumbline and the posterior of the superior endplate of S1)
* the improvement of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is the positive difference of the preoperative score and the postoperative score - expressed in % or a score (/50)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Adjacent levels degeneration preop, 24 months preoperative and post-operative comparison of the disc height of the upper and lower adjacent levels
Fusion preop, 24 months standing X-Rays observations (osseous formation)
Complications associated with the device preop, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months Per and Post-operative device complications:
Screw pull-out Loosening, breakage and pseudarthrosis based on x-rays analysisComplications associated with the surgery preop, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months Peri-operative data: length of operative time, length of correction time, blood loss ... Surgical complications
Coronal correction preop, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months * A pre/post-operative comparison of regular Cobb angles
* A pre/post-operative comparison of C7 plumb line (Coronal balance)
* A pre/post-operative comparison of Apical Vertebra Translation (AVT)Correction of the sagittal parameters preop, 24 months Sagittal parameters are evaluated by:
- Cobb angle: Thoracic kyphosis measured from T5 to T12 and between the 2 inflexion points of the curve Lumbar lordosis measured from T12 to S1 and between the 2 inflexion points of the curve
* Pelvic Incidence (PI)
* Pelvic Tilt (PT)
* Sacral Slope (SS)
* Proximal junction Cobb angle
* T1 spinopelvic inclination (T1-SPI)improvement of Quality of life preop, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months * The effect that the patient's pathology has on his/her daily life evaluated by the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS-22) questionnaire designed and recommended by the Scoliosis Research Society
* Pain reduction for back and leg by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
* Patient satisfaction with the results of their operation using a simple questionnaire (Patient Satisfaction Index - PSI) which was designed and recommended by the North American Spine Society (NASS)Vertebra rotation preop, 24 months * A pre/post-operative comparison of Rotary Vertebra Subluxation (olisthesis)
* A pre/post-operative comparison of Apical Vertebra Rotation (AVR) - Nash Moe
Trial Locations
- Locations (2)
UC Denver
🇺🇸Denver, Colorado, United States
Santy orthopedic center
🇫🇷Lyon, France