MedPath

Impact of Drug-coated Balloon Treatment in de Novo Coronary Lesion

Recruiting
Conditions
Drug-coated Balloon
Registration Number
NCT04619277
Lead Sponsor
Ulsan Medical Center
Brief Summary

This study is the international multicenter registry for drug-coated balloon treatment for de novo coronary lesion.

Detailed Description

There is lots of evidence that DCBs result in lower rates of restenosis, thrombosis, and better long-term outcomes when used for PCI of in-stent restenosis (ISR) compared to plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) or additional stenting with drug-eluting stent (DES). DCB-only approach studies for de novo coronary lesion cases are scarce, but a recent registry data suggested it was a feasible and well-tolerated treatment method if the pre-dilation result is good. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy in terms of angiographic and clinical outcomes of a DCB-only approach for de novo coronary lesions.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
10000
Inclusion Criteria
  • de novo coronary artery disease
Exclusion Criteria
  • unstable hemodynamics at presentation
  • life expectancy <1 year

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Major adverse cardiac events at 12 months12 months

Primary endpoint is major adverse cardiac events (MACE is a composite of cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, target-vessel revascularization and major bleeding \[BARC type 3 to 5\]) at 12 months.

1. Cardiac death: Any death due to proximate cardiac cause (eg, myocardial infarction, low-output failure, fatal arrhythmia), unwitnessed death and death of unknown cause, and all procedure-related deaths, including those related to concomitant treatment, will be classified as cardiac death.

2. Target vessel Revascularization: TVR is defined as any repeat percutaneous intervention or surgical bypass of any segment of the target vessel.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Angiographic and clinical outcomes12, 24, 36 months

* MACE at 12, 24, 36 months

* The single components of the primary endpoint after 12, 24, 36 months. Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 2 to 5 bleeding after 12, 24, 36 months.1 (All events will be adjudicated by an independent Critical Events Committee).

* Possible, probable, and definite stent thrombosis defined according to the ARC criteria after 12, 24, 36 months.

* Definite stent thrombosis is considered to have occurred by either angiographic or pathologic confirmation

* Cost-effectiveness of DCB vs. DES after 12, 24, 36 months.

* All-cause death ⑥ Stroke (ischemic and hemorrhagic)

* Angina severity measured with Seattle Angina Questionnaires at 12, 24 months

* Total procedure time, fluoroscopy time, contrast volume, number of stents used ⑨ DAPT duration ⑩ Periprocedural MI rate ⑪ Sex difference in MACE between DCB vs. DES ⑫ Comparison of MACE between DCB vs. DES in DM patients

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Ulsan Medical Center

🇰🇷

Ulsan, Korea, Republic of

Ulsan Medical Center
🇰🇷Ulsan, Korea, Republic of
Eun-Seok Shin
Contact
sesim1989@gmail.com

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.