MedPath

Flexible Ureteroscopy Versus ESWL in the Management of Lower Calyceal Stones

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Renal Stones
Interventions
Procedure: Shockwave lithotripsy
Procedure: Ureteroscopy
Registration Number
NCT02658942
Lead Sponsor
Cairo University
Brief Summary

to assess safety, efficacy of Flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy (LL) compared to extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) in management of lower calyceal stones (LC) stones.

Detailed Description

to assess stone free rate, number of sessions and complications of flexible ureteroscopy holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy compared to extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in the management of lower calyceal stones less than 2 cm in size.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
60
Inclusion Criteria
  • unilateral
  • radiopaque stone(s)
  • < 2 cm
  • located in the lower calyx.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Bleeding tendency
  • distal obstruction
  • Anomalies of the urinary tract
  • Solitary kidney

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Shockwave lithotripsyShockwave lithotripsyIntervention: Shockwave lithotripsy for lithotripsy of lower calyceal stones using Siemens Lithostar Lithotriptor
UreteroscopyUreteroscopyIntervention: Flexible ureteroscopy for removal of lower calyceal stones using holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Stone free rate3 months

no stone fragments or having fragments \<3mm

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Complications3 years

Bleeding Infection Pain obstruction renal or ureteric injury UTI Fever

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Cairo University Hospitals

🇪🇬

Cairo, Egypt

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath