JPRN-UMIN000005939
Completed
未知
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration(EUS-FNA) of a pancreatic solid mass using a 25-gauge fine-needle aspiration needle - normal negative pressure versus high negative pressure: A multicenter, prospective randomized controlled trial - EUS-FNA: normal versus high negative pressure.
Overview
- Phase
- 未知
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Pancreatic tumor detected by imaging study
- Sponsor
- Hokkaido University Hospital
- Enrollment
- 90
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 2 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
Biopsy procedures that combine the EUS-FNA with HNP techniques are superior to EUS-FNA with NNP procedures for tissue acquisition
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Not provided
Exclusion Criteria
- •\<20years old Enforcement of EUS\-FNA is inappropriate.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Not specified
Similar Trials
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparing the Diagnostic Adequacy of 25-gauge Fork-tip, Franseen and Reverse-bevel Type Needles in Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Tissue AcquisitionBiopsy, NeedleNCT05434247Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia178
Completed
Not Applicable
The Use of FNA and FNB in the Optimization of EUS-assisted Tissue SamplingNeoplasmsNCT02360839Per Hedenström1,000
Completed
Phase 3
EUS-FNA With 22G Procore Needles vs 22G Conventional NeedlesSelf EfficacyNCT01581762Chinese University of Hong Kong42
Unknown
Not Applicable
A Multi-center, Prospective, Single-blind, Controlled Trial Comparing Diagnostic Value of Different EUS-FNA TechniquesNeoplasmsInfectionInflammationLymphomaCancerSarcoidMass LesionNCT03674710Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital300
Recruiting
Not Applicable
EUS-FNB With MOSE vs EUS-FNA With ROSEPancreatic NeoplasmsNCT03766659Chinese University of Hong Kong340