跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01771536
NCT01771536已完成不适用

The PCI Choice Trial: a Pilot Randomized Trial of a Decision Aid for Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease

Mayo Clinic1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 132 人开始时间: 2012年11月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
Mayo Clinic
入组人数
132
试验地点
1
主要终点
Efficacy of the PCI Choice Decision aid vs. Usual Care assessed by Patient and Provider Surveys, and encounter Video/Audio Recordings

研究概览

简要总结

Despite several large clinical trials clearly establishing that coronary revascularization (i.e. percutaneous coronary intervention - PCI) does not prolong survival or prevent myocardial infarction (MI) for stable coronary artery disease (CAD), patients with stable angina continue to believe that PCI is performed to improve these outcomes. Additionally, recent concerns have emerged of overuse of PCI among patients with little or no angina. Thus there is a compelling need to share with patients the risks and benefits of PCI prior to treatment to reach an informed decision.

This study is designed to answer the question of whether a decision aid can improve patient knowledge, decisional conflict and patient satisfaction with decision-making compared to usual care for the treatment of stable angina.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Health Services Research
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •Diagnosis of stable angina - As judge by clinician, eligible for medication therapy or PCI - agree to be available for follow-up survey 3 months after treatment decision

排除标准

  • •has major communication barrier (severe hearing/vision impairment, dementia, cannot communicate with clinician in English)

研究组 & 干预措施

PCI Choice decision

Active Comparator

Decision Aid intervention is provided to clinician to share with patient

干预措施: Decision Aid (Other)

Usual Care

No Intervention

结局指标

主要结局

Efficacy of the PCI Choice Decision aid vs. Usual Care assessed by Patient and Provider Surveys, and encounter Video/Audio Recordings

时间窗: Baseline to Three Months

Efficacy in improving measures of patient knowledge and involvement, decision making quality, treatment choice and clinician satisfaction of the decision aid.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方
Mayo Clinic
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验