Integrative Oncology for Patient Symptoms
- Conditions
- Oncologic ComplicationsSymptoms and Signs
- Interventions
- Other: AcupunctureOther: Touch Therapies
- Registration Number
- NCT04940780
- Lead Sponsor
- Shaare Zedek Medical Center
- Brief Summary
The use of complementary and integrative medicine (CIM) among oncology patients is widespread, with a large body of research-based evidence supporting the ability of these therapies to alleviate symptoms related to cancer and its treatment. Organizations such as the American Society for Clinical Oncology and the European Society for Medical Oncology have included CIM modalities in their treatment guidelines, and many of today's leading cancer centers include CIM in their supportive care service. The proposed study will prospectively examine the impact of a CIM treatment program on the symptom burden, quality of life and function of patients undergoing active oncology treatment.
A total of 750 patients will undergo an integrative oncologist (IP) consultation followed by a series of 8 CIM treatments consisting of either acupuncture or touch-related therapies (reflexology, Shiatsu, Tuina, etc.) with the goal of relieving their symptoms. Patients will be allocated to one of the two study treatment arms: the "Patient-Preference Arm", for patients who specify their preference for either acupuncture or touch therapy; and the "Randomized Treatment Arm", for those with no preference, to be randomly allocated to either the acupuncture or touch-therapy subgroup. Patients will be asked to complete the following study questionnaires before and after the treatment regimen: the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30); the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS); and the Measure Yourself Concerns and Wellbeing (MYCAW) tool. The primary study outcome will be the change in EORTC Global Health-Status / Quality of Life scores, from pre- to post-treatment. Secondary study outcomes will include EORTC QLQ-C30 functional and symptom scales, single items assessing additional symptoms commonly reported by cancer patients, and perceived financial impact of the disease; ESAS severity scores for 10 quality-of life related items; and MYCAW severity scores for the 2 most significant symptoms, as well as post-treatment narratives. Other secondary outcomes to be assessed include the safety of the study treatments (adverse effects); adherence to conventional treatment regimen; and narratives from the patient's informal caregiver (spouse, parent/child, sibling, friend, etc.).
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 750
- age ≥ 18 years
- undergoing active oncology treatment
- fully understand the study plan
- agree to sign the study informed consent form.
- not fulfilling all of the study criteria
- not interested in attending all 8 weekly CIM treatments sessions
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Patient Preference Arm Touch Therapies patients who specify their preference for either acupuncture or touch therapy Randomized Treatment Arm Touch Therapies with no preference, to be randomly allocated to either the acupuncture or touch-therapy subgroup Randomized Treatment Arm Acupuncture with no preference, to be randomly allocated to either the acupuncture or touch-therapy subgroup Patient Preference Arm Acupuncture patients who specify their preference for either acupuncture or touch therapy
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status / QoL scale 8 weeks Change from baseline to the end of the 8-week integrative treatment program
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method EORTC QLQ-C30 - additional outcomes From baseline to 8- (end of treatment program) and 16-week (post-program) assessment Change in functional and symptom scores
ESAS symptom severity scores From baseline to 8- (end of treatment program) and 16-week (post-program) assessment Change in severity scores for 10 quality-of life related items
Frequency of adverse effects At the end of the series of 8 weekly CIM treatment sessions (≤ 2 weeks after the last treatment session); after 16 weeks from baseline. Any reported adverse events taking place during the study period which are considered to have possibly/probably resulted from the CIM intervention
Adherence to conventional oncology treatment regimen At 16 weeks from baseline. Adherence to oncology treatment to be measured using the Relative Dose Intensity (RDI) calculation
EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status / QoL scale 16 weeks Change from baseline and 8-week assessment to 16 week follow-up
MYCAW symptom severity scores From baseline to 8- (end of treatment program) and 16-week (post-program) assessment Change in severity scores for the 2 most significant symptoms, as well as post-treatment narratives
Caregiver expectations At baseline Narratives from the patient's informal caregiver (spouse, parent/child, sibling, friend, etc.).
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Institute of Oncology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center
🇮🇱Jerusalem, Israel