Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT06841432
NCT06841432CompletedNot Applicable

Endoscopic Coblation Versus Suction Diathermy in Pediatric Adenoidectomy: Randomized Clinical Trial

Al-Azhar University1 site in 1 country245 target enrollmentStarted: July 1, 2024Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
245
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Operative duration

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare two surgical procedures in endoscopic adenoidectomy including Coblation and Suction diathermy

. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does the Coblation device have less time, less pain, less postoperative crustation and bad odor, less intraoperative bleeding, and less recurrence?

Participants will:

will undergo both procedures every day for 6 months Visit the clinic once every 2 weeks for checkups and tests Keep a diary of their symptoms

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
2 Years to 18 Years (Child, Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •all patients aged 2 to 18 years
  • •patients who had isolated adenoid hypertrophy
  • •patients' hemoglobin levels above 10 mg/dl

Exclusion Criteria

  • •those with recent upper respiratory tract infections, evidence of bleeding disorders, serous otitis media, chronic tonsillitis
  • •those advised against undergoing adenoidectomy after consulting a phoniatrist
  • •patients with atrophic rhinitis those with nasal obstruction caused by other nasal or paranasal conditions such as inferior turbinate hypertrophy, Choanal atresia, deviated nasal septum, antrochoanal polyps, and other causes of nasal obstruction in children.

Arms & Interventions

patients who underwent the adenoidectomy using suction diathermy

Active Comparator

One hundred and five patients underwent a suction diathermy adenoidectomy procedure. The soft palate was gently retracted using two suction catheters, allowing a 70-degree angled endoscope (Storz, Germany) placed in the oropharynx to provide a clear view of the adenoidal tissue and surrounding structures in the nasopharynx. Using a malleable size 10 or 12 French hand-switching suction coagulator, the adenoidal tissue was carefully ablated, starting from the uppermost part. The procedure was completed when the posterior choanae were clearly visible, and the nasopharynx had a smooth, unobstructed appearance. Great care was taken to avoid injuring the Eustachian tube orifice, posterior septum, choanae, inferior turbinate, palate, and posterior pharyngeal wall. Continuous irrigation with saline, either through the mouth or the nose, helped minimize any thermal damage caused by the diathermy machine.

Intervention: adenoidectomy by Suction diathermy (Procedure)

patients who underwent the adenoidectomy using coblation

Experimental

One hundred and five patients underwent a Coblation-assisted adenoidectomy procedure. The child was positioned in Rose's position, which helped retract the soft palate and improve visibility of the nasopharynx. Two soft rubber catheters were inserted into the patient's mouth, with the distal and proximal ends crossed externally and secured with a clamp. The COBLATOR™ II surgery system Model EC8000-01 was used, with a power setting of nine for ablation and five for coagulation. Under general anesthesia, the adenoidectomy was performed using either a 4 mm, 70-degree angled endoscope inserted orally or a zero-degree endoscope inserted through the nose, providing effective visualization of the nasopharynx. After the procedure, hemostasis was achieved by using a combination of the coagulation and ablation modes.

Intervention: adenoidectomy using coblatioion (Procedure)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Operative duration

Time Frame: During the procedure

The procedure, from the initial insertion of the Bowel-Davis mouth gag to the complete removal of the adenoid and the gag, was timed in minutes.

Intraopertive blood loss

Time Frame: during the procedures

Boezaart surgical field grading scale was used to evaluate the intraoperative bleeding

Postopertaive Pain

Time Frame: Patients reported their pain levels every day before taking any pain medication during the 7 days after their surgery

The Wong-Baker Pain Scale consists of 6 faces depicting different levels of pain. Face 1 represents no pain, Face 2 indicates a little bit of hurt, Face 3 indicates a little more hurt, Face 4 indicates even more hurt, Face 5 indicates a whole lot of hurt, and Face 6 indicates the worst possible hurt, with pain scores ranging from 0 to 10. Both the children and their parents were informed about the purpose of the questionnaires and how to fill them out before the surgery

Secondary Outcomes

  • Development of bad breath(from the end of operation till 2 weeks post operation)
  • recovery time(three months post opertaive)
  • secondary bleeding(up to one month surgery)
  • Pre- and post-adenoid size grading(preintervention (one day before opertaion ) and postintervention (up to three months))

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Ahmed Nabil Selim

Resident doctor of otorhinolanrgology at alazhar univeristy hopsital in assiut

Al-Azhar University

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

Coblation Versus Suction Diathermy in... | Clinical Trial