Coblation Versus Suction Diathermy in Pediatric Adenoidectomy
- Conditions
- Adenoid HypertrophyAdenoidectomyCoblation AdenoidectomySuction Daithermy
- Registration Number
- NCT06841432
- Lead Sponsor
- Al-Azhar University
- Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare two surgical procedures in endoscopic adenoidectomy including Coblation and Suction diathermy
. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does the Coblation device have less time, less pain, less postoperative crustation and bad odor, less intraoperative bleeding, and less recurrence?
Participants will:
will undergo both procedures every day for 6 months Visit the clinic once every 2 weeks for checkups and tests Keep a diary of their symptoms
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 245
- all patients aged 2 to 18 years
- patients who had isolated adenoid hypertrophy
- patients' hemoglobin levels above 10 mg/dl
- those with recent upper respiratory tract infections, evidence of bleeding disorders, serous otitis media, chronic tonsillitis
- those advised against undergoing adenoidectomy after consulting a phoniatrist
- patients with atrophic rhinitis those with nasal obstruction caused by other nasal or paranasal conditions such as inferior turbinate hypertrophy, Choanal atresia, deviated nasal septum, antrochoanal polyps, and other causes of nasal obstruction in children.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Operative duration During the procedure The procedure, from the initial insertion of the Bowel-Davis mouth gag to the complete removal of the adenoid and the gag, was timed in minutes.
Intraopertive blood loss during the procedures Boezaart surgical field grading scale was used to evaluate the intraoperative bleeding
Postopertaive Pain Patients reported their pain levels every day before taking any pain medication during the 7 days after their surgery The Wong-Baker Pain Scale consists of 6 faces depicting different levels of pain. Face 1 represents no pain, Face 2 indicates a little bit of hurt, Face 3 indicates a little more hurt, Face 4 indicates even more hurt, Face 5 indicates a whole lot of hurt, and Face 6 indicates the worst possible hurt, with pain scores ranging from 0 to 10. Both the children and their parents were informed about the purpose of the questionnaires and how to fill them out before the surgery
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Development of bad breath from the end of operation till 2 weeks post operation frequency of Children who presented with bad breath
recovery time three months post opertaive time which was talken for the patients to resume their normal social routines
secondary bleeding up to one month surgery frequency of Children who presented with bleeding that occurred after 24 hrs of operation
Pre- and post-adenoid size grading preintervention (one day before opertaion ) and postintervention (up to three months) The Parikh grading system (1-4) is used to assess the extent of adenoid tissue contact with surrounding structures: Grade 1 - adenoid tissue not in contact, Grade 2 - adenoid tissue in contact with Eustachian tube cushions, Grade 3 - adenoid tissue in contact with vomer, Grade 4 - adenoid tissue in contact with soft palate
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Alazhar university Hopital in Assiut
🇪🇬Assiut, Egypt