MedPath

Paracervical Versus Intracervical Lidocaine

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Abortion, Induced
Pain
Interventions
Procedure: Intracervical
Procedure: Paracervical block
Drug: Buffered Lidocaine, vasopressin, sodium bicarbonate
Registration Number
NCT00816751
Lead Sponsor
University of California, San Diego
Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to estimate the efficacy of intracervical versus paracervical block on pain experienced during first trimester suction curettage without the use of preoperative cervical ripening. Because of the theoretical improved reliability of stromal block, the investigators hypothesize that intracervical block would produce lower pain scores than paracervical block at the time of cervical dilation.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
89
Inclusion Criteria
  • Women presenting for elective first trimester abortion
Exclusion Criteria
  • Gestation over 12 weeks by ultrasound
  • Weight less than 98 pounds
  • Known allergy to lidocaine
  • Known nonviable pregnancy

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
2Intracervical-
2Buffered Lidocaine, vasopressin, sodium bicarbonate-
1Paracervical block-
1Buffered Lidocaine, vasopressin, sodium bicarbonate-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Pain Score, as Assessed Using a 10 cm Linear Visual Analog Scale (VAS)at completion of procedure

VAS on a scale of 1 to 10 with 1 being lowest pain and 10 highest amount of pain

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Gestational Age at Time of ProcedureAt the time of the procedure

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Planned Parenthood

🇺🇸

San Diego, California, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath