Paracervical Versus Intracervical Lidocaine
- Conditions
- Abortion, InducedPain
- Interventions
- Procedure: IntracervicalProcedure: Paracervical blockDrug: Buffered Lidocaine, vasopressin, sodium bicarbonate
- Registration Number
- NCT00816751
- Lead Sponsor
- University of California, San Diego
- Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to estimate the efficacy of intracervical versus paracervical block on pain experienced during first trimester suction curettage without the use of preoperative cervical ripening. Because of the theoretical improved reliability of stromal block, the investigators hypothesize that intracervical block would produce lower pain scores than paracervical block at the time of cervical dilation.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- Female
- Target Recruitment
- 89
- Women presenting for elective first trimester abortion
- Gestation over 12 weeks by ultrasound
- Weight less than 98 pounds
- Known allergy to lidocaine
- Known nonviable pregnancy
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description 2 Intracervical - 2 Buffered Lidocaine, vasopressin, sodium bicarbonate - 1 Paracervical block - 1 Buffered Lidocaine, vasopressin, sodium bicarbonate -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Pain Score, as Assessed Using a 10 cm Linear Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at completion of procedure VAS on a scale of 1 to 10 with 1 being lowest pain and 10 highest amount of pain
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Gestational Age at Time of Procedure At the time of the procedure
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Planned Parenthood
🇺🇸San Diego, California, United States