MedPath

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) and Intensive Therapy in Aphasia

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Aphasia
Interventions
Device: transcranial direct current stimulation
Registration Number
NCT03510182
Lead Sponsor
University of Michigan
Brief Summary

Intensive therapy for aphasia has been demonstrated to improve language functioning after stroke or other neurological injury. However, recovery is generally not complete and new therapies are needed to improve outcomes. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been shown to improve outcomes with motor therapy after stroke. This study will examine the feasibility of using tDCS with intensive language therapy as a way of enhancing language outcomes in aphasia

Detailed Description

Intensive therapy for aphasia has been demonstrated to improve language functioning after stroke or other neurological injury. However, recovery is generally not complete and new therapies are needed to improve outcomes. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been shown to improve outcomes with motor therapy after stroke. This study will examine the feasibility of using tDCS supplementing clinically determined intensive language therapy as a way of enhancing language outcomes in aphasia. Eligible clients enrolled in the University of Michigan Aphasia Program (UMAP) will be invited to participate in the study. Clients will receive 20 minutes of tDCS every day along with their usual treatment protocol. Pre and post testing will be completed to assess for improvement in language functioning. This is a feasibility and proof of concept study to determine if a randomized control trial should be pursued

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
25
Inclusion Criteria
  • Diagnosis of aphasia
  • Enrolled in intensive therapy program at the University of Michigan Aphasia Program.
  • Ability to understand and give consent to treatment.
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • No metal implants or surgical devices
  • History of seizures
  • History of significant cognitive or psychiatric disturbance
  • Participant cannot be pregnant at the time of study
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
transcranial Direct Current Stimulationtranscranial direct current stimulationtDCS will be given to all qualified patients with aphasia.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in Boston Naming Scorebaseline and 4 weeks

This test assesses confrontational naming ability to 60 line drawings. Scores range from 0-60 with higher scores representing better performance. Outcome was derived as followed : Picture naming score post tDCS minus picture naming score pre tDCS

Change in Controlled Oral Word Fluencybaseline and 4 weeks

This test assesses the number of words that can be generated in one minute that begin with certain letters. The total number of words generated for three letters is derived. Higher scores represent better performance. Changes in word fluency were calculated as follows: number of words generated post tDCS minus number of words generated pre tDCS

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in Western Aphasia Quotient Scorebaseline and 4 weeks

severity of aphasia is measured by the Western Aphasia Battery Revised. The Aphasia Quotient (AQ) score ranges from 0-100, with 100 being a perfect score. Change in the AQ was derived as follows : AQ post tDCS minus AQ pre tDCS

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University Center for Language and Literacy

🇺🇸

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath