MedPath

Comparative Study of Epigastric Pain Syndrome and Postprandial Distress Syndrome

Phase 4
Withdrawn
Conditions
Functional Dyspepsia
Epigastric Pain Syndrome
Post Prandial Distress Syndrome
Interventions
Radiation: gastric scintigraphy
Registration Number
NCT00673972
Lead Sponsor
National Taiwan University Hospital
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare postprandial distress syndrome and epigastric pain syndrome in demographics psychological features, infection of Helicobacter pylori, gastric emptying and therapeutic response to lansoprazole.

Detailed Description

Functional dyspepsia is a common clinical disorder with significant impact on quality of life and with enormous social cost. Previous studies have revealed that functional dyspepsia is not a homogenous disease but a heterogenous symptom complex. Because of heterogeneity in etiology and pathogenesis, no specific treatment is appropriate for all patients with functional dyspepsia. Currently available treatments demonstrated efficacy only in subsets of patients.

Appropriate subgrouping of functional dyspepsia, which categorizes more homogenous patients into the same group, will correlate better with specific etiologic factors and pathogenetic mechanisms. Consequently patients may have appropriate specific treatment based on more directed pathologenesis and subgrouping. To this end, American Gastroenterology Association launched new edition of clinical guide for functional gastrointestinal disorder, the Rome III in May 2006. The new diagnostic criteria of Rome III de-emphasized functional dyspepsia as an entity and recommended sub-classification into two conditions: postprandial distress syndrome and epigastric pain syndrome. However whether this new diagnostic criteria and systems are effective and clinically relevant remains unknown.

Aims:

We aim to compare postprandial distress syndrome and epigastric pain syndrome in demographics psychological features, infection of Helicobacter pylori, gastric emptying and therapeutic response to lansoprazole.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
WITHDRAWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
80
Inclusion Criteria
  • aged greater than 20 years
  • fulfill Rome III diagnostic criteria
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • children and teenagers aged less than 20 years
  • Organic lesions such as ulcers, tumors, bleeding, vasculopathy or esophagitis as demonstrated on upper endoscopy
  • concurrent illness with malignancy, diabetes mellitus, liver cirrhosis, renal failure or porphyria
  • diagnosis of organic disease for dyspeptic symptoms by treating physicians
  • history of abdominal surgery
  • concurrent user of aspirin and NSAID
  • history of allergy or severe side effects to lansoparzole
  • pregnant or lactating women
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
EPSgastric scintigraphyPatients with functional dyspepsia will be classified into EPS or PDS two subgroups according to Rome III diagnostic criteria.
PDSgastric scintigraphyPatients with functional dyspepsia will be classified into EPS or PDS two subgroups according to Rome III diagnostic criteria.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Primary end point of the study is to compare the gastric emptying time in epigastric pain syndrome and that in postprandial distress syndromeAfter four-week treatment of lansoprazole
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Psychiatric distress, personality traits, infection of H. pylori and symptom improvement to lansoprazoleafter four-week treatment of lansoprazole

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

National Taiwan University Hospital

🇨🇳

Taipei City, Taiwan

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath