Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04021979
NCT04021979
Unknown
Not Applicable

Comparison of Two Bowel Cleansing Regimens(Controlled Dietary Restriction With Enteral Nutrition and 1.5L Polyethylene Glycol vs Controlled Dietary Restriction and 2.0L Polyethylene Glycol):an Endoscopist-blinded, Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

Ningbo No. 1 Hospital1 site in 1 country248 target enrollmentAugust 1, 2019

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Enteral Nutrition Powder Ensure
Conditions
Bowel Preparation
Sponsor
Ningbo No. 1 Hospital
Enrollment
248
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
the quality of bowel preparation
Last Updated
6 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

This clinical trial is being conducted to assess whether dietary restriction with enteral nutrition prescribed could prevent nonadherence to dietary restrictions, enable additional reduction of the required volume of PEG-ELS.

Detailed Description

Bowel preparation plays a vital role in the quality of colonoscopy.Bowel preparation consists of 2 key steps: dietary restriction and purgative ingestion.Two liters of PEG-ELS are widely used in Asian countries, but in a well-designed clinical trial,additional reduction of PEG-ELS volume seems feasible. Enteral nutrition may simplify the process and avoid unexpected intake of fiber-containing food. We hypothesized that dietary restriction with enteral nutrition prescribed could prevent nonadherence to dietary restrictions, enable additional reduction of the required volume of PEG-ELS.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
August 1, 2019
End Date
November 1, 2019
Last Updated
6 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Ningbo No. 1 Hospital
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • the age of 18-75year
  • Outpatients undergoing colonoscopy
  • Informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

  • the age \>75 years or \<18 years
  • history of colectomy or bowel obstruction
  • severe constipation (defined as stool frequerncy of 3 or less/week)
  • current pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • BMI \>30, diabetes
  • known allergies to cleansing agents or ingredients of Enteral nutrition
  • inability to follow the oral bowel preparation regimen.

Arms & Interventions

Enteral Nutritional+PEG

Enteral Nutritional Powder with low volume 1.5L PEG

Intervention: Enteral Nutrition Powder Ensure

Enteral Nutritional+PEG

Enteral Nutritional Powder with low volume 1.5L PEG

Intervention: 1.5L PEG

Self-controlled diet+PEG

Self-controlled diet with normal amount of 2L PEG

Intervention: Self-controlled diet

Self-controlled diet+PEG

Self-controlled diet with normal amount of 2L PEG

Intervention: 2L PEG

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

the quality of bowel preparation

Time Frame: 1day

Evaluation of the quality of bowel preparation for each participant by the Ottawa bowel preparation scale(OBPS),it's a validated scoring system with scores between 0 and 14, where 0 is the best score,The score comprises a sub score 0-4 for each colon segment: right, transverse and rectosigmoid colon.n addition, a score 0-2 is added to indicate the total amount of luminal fluid.

Secondary Outcomes

  • adverse events(1day)
  • patients' satisfaction with the process of bowel preparation(1day)
  • Convenience of Protocol between enteral nutrition with low volume 1.5L PEG and Self-controlled diet with normal amount of 2L PEG Protocol(1day)
  • patients' willingness to have the colonoscopy done again at this facility in the future(1day)
  • comparison with previous experience(1day)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials