跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT00641927
NCT00641927已完成4 期

Acute Antidepressant Therapy in Bipolar II Major Depression

Stanley Medical Research Institute1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 90 人开始时间: 2002年4月最近更新:
适应症
干预措施
相关药物

试验速览

阶段
4 期
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
90
试验地点
1
主要终点
Reduction in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score.

研究概览

简要总结

This study examines the relative safety and benefit of antidepressant therapy (versus recommended mood stabilizer therapy)of bipolar type II major depressive episode. We hypothesize that antidepressant therapy will be superior to mood stabilizer therapy with little or no difference in treatment emergent manic symptoms.

详细描述

Bipolar type II (BP II) major depressive episode (MDE), affects 2.5% of the US adult population and results in an estimated healthcare cost of $40 billion annually. BP II disorder is a distinct clinical entity that differs from BP I disorder, and is characterized by a preponderance of MDEs that result in particularly high morbidity and mortality rates. The treatment of BP II MDE remains a challenge for clinicians. Concerns over antidepressant drug (AD) induced manic switch episodes have led current practice guidelines to recommend treating BP II MDE with mood stabilizer (MS) monotherapy and to avoid AD monotherapy. To date, there are no controlled clinical trials to test the validity of these empirical guidelines. Results from our preliminary BP II MDE studies have shown that fluoxetine monotherapy may be safe and effective initial treatment of BP II MDE with a low manic switch rate. Based upon these observations, we now ask (Specific aim #1): "What is the relative safety and efficacy of initial AD monotherapy vs. MS monotherapy of BP II MDE?" and "What is the relative manic switch rate of initial AD vs. MS monotherapy of BP II MDE?" To answer these questions, patients with BP II MDE will be treated in a 12-week, randomized, parallel group comparison of venlafaxine monotherapy vs. lithium monotherapy. We hypothesize that AD monotherapy will have superior efficacy vs. MS monotherapy, and that there will be a similar manic switch rate among both treatment conditions. If our hypotheses are correct, we believe that these results may have an important public health impact on the current practice guidelines for treating BP II MDE.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • men and women (all races and ethnicity) greater than or equal to18 years of age,
  • DSM IV diagnosis of BP II disorder,
  • Current DSM IV MDE,
  • HAM-D17 score greater than or equal to 16,
  • Drug free from prior psychotropic medication greater than or equal to 7 days (2 weeks for MAOIs)

排除标准

  • History of mania,
  • Other primary DSM IV Axis I diagnosis,
  • Alcohol or drug dependence within 3 months,
  • History of nonresponse to Effexor-XR or lithium in the present MDE,
  • History of allergic reaction to Effexor-XR or lithium,
  • Medical contraindications to treatment with Effexor-XR or lithium,
  • Unstable medical condition,
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding women,
  • Women of child-bearing potential not using a medically approved form of contraception,
  • Actively suicidal or requiring hospitalization,
  • Requiring concurrent antidepressant, neuroleptic or mood stabilizer therapy,
  • Prior investigational study within 4 weeks of starting active therapy.

研究组 & 干预措施

1

Experimental

Antidepressant

干预措施: Venlafaxine (Drug)

2

Active Comparator

Drug

干预措施: Lithium Carbonate (Drug)

结局指标

主要结局

Reduction in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score.

时间窗: 12 Weeks

次要结局

  • Change in Young Mania Rating Scale score.(12 Weeks)

研究者

发起方
Stanley Medical Research Institute
申办方类型
Other

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Antidepressant Therapy for Bipolar II Major... | 临床试验