MedPath

Swedish Drug-elution Trial in Peripheral Arterial Disease

Not Applicable
Active, not recruiting
Conditions
Critical Limb Ischemia
Peripheral Arterial Disease
Intermittent Claudication
Interventions
Procedure: Revascularization with drug-eluting technology
Procedure: Revascularization without drug-eluting technology
Device: drug-coated balloons and/or drug-eluting stents
Registration Number
NCT02051088
Lead Sponsor
Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sweden
Brief Summary

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) causes reduced blood flow to the lower limb(s) due to stenosis or occlusion in the supplying arteries. Symptoms of PAD range from ischemic rest pain and/or ischemic ulcers/gangrene (critical limb ischemia), putting the extremity at risk of amputation, to exercise-induced pain (intermittent claudication), limiting the patients daily activities. Invasive treatments are often indicated to prevent amputations and to alleviate symptoms. More than two thirds of these procedures are presently performed with endovascular techniques (i.e. percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, PTA with or without stent implantation).

In coronary artery disease, stents eluting anti-proliferative drugs (drug eluting stents, DES) reduce restenosis and improve clinical results for the majority of patients. Drug eluting balloons (DEB) are a promising alternative, but there is still little evidence that DES or DEB technology improve clinical outcome in PAD. However, promising results utilizing these new technologies in PAD have been reported in a few studies.

In this trial, we test the hypothesis that drug eluting (DE) technology is superior to conventional endovascular treatment (no-DE) in terms of important clinical outcomes, when applied on infrainguinal (femoropopliteal and/or infrapopliteal) obstructive vascular lesions. The trial consists of 2 separate parallel studies, SWEDEPAD 1 and SWEDEPAD 2, each defined by the severity of peripheral arterial disease. Patients with critical limb ischemia are allocated to SWEDEPAD 1 and patients with intermittent claudication are allocated to SWEDEPAD 2.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
3800
Inclusion Criteria
  • All adults > 18 years old willing to be randomized
  • Symptomatic PAD (critical limb ischemia or intermittent claudication) caused by >50% stenosis or occlusion of infrainguinal arteries and eligible for endovascular treatment according to established indications
Exclusion Criteria
  • Acute thromboembolic disease in the leg
  • Infrainguinal aneurysmal disease
  • Previous participation in the study or in other randomised interventional study of infrainguinal lesions
  • Patients without a Swedish personal identification number

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Revascularization with drug eluting technologyRevascularization with drug-eluting technologyRevascularization with drug eluting technology
Revascularization with drug eluting technologydrug-coated balloons and/or drug-eluting stentsRevascularization with drug eluting technology
Revascularization without drug elutionRevascularization without drug-eluting technologyRevascularization without drug elution technology
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Amputation rate (SWEDEPAD 1)Assessed when all patients have been followed for at least one year

Primary endpoint for patients with critical limb ischemia (SWEDEPAD 1) is amputation rate during follow-up, analysed when all patients have been followed for at least one year.

Health-related quality of life (SWEDEPAD 2)Assessed one year after randomization

Primary endpoint for patients with intermittent claudication (SWEDEPAD 2) is health-related quality of life after one year, assessed with VascuQol-6, a disease-specific health related quality of life instrument in PAD.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
SurvivalAssessed when all participants have been followed for at least one, three and five years.
Amputation-free survivalAssessed when all participants have been followed for at least one, three and five years.
Target lesion revascularization (TLR)Assessed one year after the intervention and when all participants have been followed for one, three and five years.

Need for re-intervention during follow-up

PatencyAssessed after 1 month and 1 year

Patency, defined as freedom from binary restenosis, a reduction in lumen diameter ≥50% in patients assessed with duplex ultrasound after one month and after one year (only certain centres).

Health-related quality of life (SWEDEPAD 1)Assessed after one year following randomisation

Health-related quality of life, assessed with the disease-specific instrument VascuQoL-6

Health-economic assessmentAssessed one year after the intervention and when all participants have been followed for one, three and five years

Assessment of cost-effectiveness and clinical utility (only certain centres).

Time to target lesion revascularizationAssessed one year after the intervention and when all participants have been followed for one, three and five years.
Amputation rate (SWEDEPAD 2)Assessed one year after the intervention and when all participants have been followed for one, three and five years
Improvement in clinical symptoms, assessed with the Rutherford classificationAssessed after one month and one year

Particularly changes from Rutherford categories 4, 5 and 6 to lower categories will analysed (SWEDEPAD 1)

Particularly changes from Rutherford categories 2 and 3 to other categories will analysed (SWEDEPAD 2)

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Sahlgrenska University Hospital

🇸🇪

Göteborg, Sweden

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath