Pre-pectoral Breast Reconstruction PART 2
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer
- Interventions
- Device: Two-stage with Acellular Dermal Matrix (CELLIS® Breast)Device: Two-stage with Titanium Coated Polypropylene Mesh (TiLOOOP® Bra)
- Registration Number
- NCT02831426
- Lead Sponsor
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
- Brief Summary
The rationale for present trial conception and design moves forward from the assumption that a subcutaneous, pre-pectoral reconstruction by means of soft tissue replacement devices is feasible, safe and giving rewarding results when compared to the standard retro-pectoral technique. Ahead of that, the trial aims to test if there is a difference in the outcomes between a biological and a synthetic material when placed as a support under the mastectomy skin flaps, both in terms of immediate complications and of long-term results.
- Detailed Description
This phase III randomized clinical trial will be investigating the Two-stage, using Tissue Expander (TE) pre-pectoral reconstructions.
The trial will comprise two arms:
PRE-PECTORAL technique with a biological Acellular Dermal Matrix (ADM) prosthesis coverage and support + FAT GRAFTING VS PRE-PECTORAL technique with a synthetic Titanium Coated Polypropylene Mesh (TCPM) prosthesis coverage and support + FAT GRAFTING
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- Female
- Target Recruitment
- 86
- Inclusion criteria will entail cases of conservative mastectomies (skin-sparing mastectomy SSM, nipple-sparing mastectomy NSM and skin-reducing mastectomy SRM), both prophylactic and therapeutic.
Included patients baseline characteristics will be:
- age 18-80 years old
- BMI between 18.5 and 35.
- Former smokers (up until 3 weeks before surgery)
- hypertension at oral medications
- diabetes
- previous breast surgery
- previous breast and chest wall radiation therapy will be allowed.
- T4 and metastatic breast cancers
- obese patients (BMI over 35)
- currently smoking patients (within 3 weeks before surgery)
- refusal to sign the consent
- severe comorbidities requiring a chronic therapy (renal failure, heart failure, cardiovascular diseases, pulmonary diseases, hepatic diseases, and metabolic diseases).
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description ADM two-stage reconstruction Two-stage with Acellular Dermal Matrix (CELLIS® Breast) Two-stage with Acellular Dermal Matrix (CELLIS® Breast). Tissue Expander A, Pre-pectoral, subcutaneous, two-stage reconstruction by means of TE supported by ADM TCPM two-stage reconstruction Two-stage with Titanium Coated Polypropylene Mesh (TiLOOOP® Bra) Two-stage with Titanium Coated Polypropylene Mesh (TiLOOOP® Bra). Tissue Expander B, Pre-pectoral, subcutaneous, two-stage reconstruction by means of TE supported by TCPM
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Rate in percentage of surgical complications up to 6 months Surgical outcomes will be evaluated considering the rate in percentage of cases affected by the following complications among total number:
surgical site infection (any infection requiring an antibiotic therapy, either oral or intravenous), wound dehiscence, seroma (any fluid collection requiring aspiration for more than a month from mastectomy), nipple/skin necrosis (either partial or complete), hematoma, red breast syndrome, with their reintervention rate. Rates will be compared between the two groupsRate in percentage of technique failure up to 6 months The failure rate, as percentage, will be compared between the two arms:
failure will be the prosthesis (implant or TE) loss rate (reintervention with prosthesis removal) among overall number of prostheses implanted.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Objective quality of life assessment with Baker scale for capsular contracture at 2 years from mastectomy Long-term outcomes, after two years from mastectomy and at least 3 months from TE/implant exchange, in quality of life will entail first of all an objective assessment: such evaluation will include the capsular contracture rate, with the assessment of the reintervention rate for amelioration or for a reconstructive strategy change. Among these objective evaluations, any possible short-term complications after second-stage procedure will be investigated.
Objective quality of life assessment with cosmetic evaluation on pictures with a Likert scale for scoring at 2 years from mastectomy A third party objective evaluation will be carried out by a group of a surgeon, a nurse and a lay person from a different center from that one where every single case was performed. This third party evaluation will assess the cosmetic outcome based on medical photographic files, giving a score for each patient. Scores from the two arms will be compared.
Subjective quality of life assessment with BREAST-Q questionnaire (Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and The University of British Columbia © 2006, all rights reserved) at 2 years from mastectomy After 2 years from mastectomy and at least 3 months from TE/implant exchange a subjective evaluation will be carried out with BREAST-Q score (scores from the two arms will be transformed in 100 scale, summed and compared as median)
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Breast Surgery Unit, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital NHS Trust
🇬🇧London, United Kingdom