跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05961072
NCT05961072尚未招募不适用

Vibrotactile Stimulation for Improved Gait and Pain After Major Lower Extremity Amputation Using a Non-invasive Vibration Device

Massachusetts General Hospital1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 50 人开始时间: 2023年8月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
入组人数
50
试验地点
1
主要终点
Measure Velocity

研究概览

简要总结

To determine the benefit of the vvibrotactile sensory feedback device.

详细描述

In the United States, approximately 150.000 patients undergo a lower extremity amputation annually. With a high change of developing neuropathic pain, decreased mobility due to the missing limb and therefore depressed mental wellbeing, lower extremity amputations are debilitating the patient on multiple facets. From the usage of non-mechanical prosthetic wear, meaningful improvements have been made in surgical amputee care in the recent decades. Osseointegration, and later regenerative nerve surgical techniques like targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) and regenerative peripheral nerve interface (RPNI) have led to major improvements in the mobility of lower limb amputees, by introducing myoeletric prosthetics. Although technological advances have let to improved motoric function and motor control over artificial limbs, sensory feedback is still a very complex aspect of regaining full control over the missing limb. Recently, introduced as a technical variation on TMR, Targeted Sensory Reinnervation is based on reinnervation of a defined skin area by another sensory nerve. Recently, application of vibrotactile feedback, connected to the lower extremity prosthetic socket, has shown promising results in regaining proprioception in the missing limb, resulting in improved walking ability and pain. However, Targeted Sensory Reinnervation (TSR) is a novel surgical technique which is not always possible to perform and not available to every lower extremity amputee. Therefore, this study aims to investigate whether this vibrotactile sensory feedback device improves gait and pain in major lower limb amputee population regardless of whether TSR has been conducted.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Na
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •English-speaking
  • •Major lower limb amputee
  • •Willing and able to participate

排除标准

  • •Age under 18

研究组 & 干预措施

Patients receiving the vibrotactile sensory feedback device

Experimental

Patients who have undergone a major lower limb amputation and are receiving the vibrotactile sensory feedback device

干预措施: Vibrotactile sensory feedback device (Device)

结局指标

主要结局

Measure Velocity

时间窗: One Year

To investigate the potential effects of vibrotactile stimulation on gait velocity by asking the participant to walk a given distance during gait tests and measuring the velocity during which they walk during this distance. The specific gait test is the 10-meter gait velocity test (meters/second).

Measure User Satisfaction of Function

时间窗: One Year

To investigate the potential effects of vibrotactile stimulation on physical function of the patient through the Orthotics Prosthetics Users Survey satisfaction with device questionnaire after the gait tests. This scale goes from 20-100 where lower numbers indicate easier ability to perform physical activities.

Measure Pain Overall

时间窗: One Year

To investigate the potential effects of vibrotactile stimulation on amputation-related pain through patient-reported outcomes such as the Defense and Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS). This scale goes from 0 (no pain) to a 10 (as bad as it could be, nothing else matters).

Measure Pain Interference

时间窗: One Year

To investigate the potential effects of vibrotactile stimulation on amputation-related pain through patient-reported outcomes such as Patient Reported Outcome Measurements Pain Interference Short Form 4a. This scale goes from 4-20 where lower numbers indicate less pain.

Measure Pain Intensity

时间窗: One Year

To investigate the potential effects of vibrotactile stimulation on amputation-related pain through patient-reported outcomes such as Patient Reported Outcome Measurements Pain Intensity Short Form 3a. This scale goes from 3-15 where lower numbers indicate less pain.

Measure Endurance

时间窗: One Year

To investigate the potential effects of vibrotactile stimulation on endurance by asking the participant to walk a given distance during the 2 minute walking endurance test (meters).

Measure Physical Function

时间窗: One Year

To investigate the potential effects of vibrotactile stimulation on physical function of the patient through the Patient Reported Outcome Measurements Physical function short form 6b. This scale goes from 6-30 where lower numbers mean that the patient is less physically able.

次要结局

  • Measure Patient Depression(One Year)
  • Measure Patient Anxiety(One Year)
  • Measure Patient Satisfaction(One Year)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Kyle R. Eberlin, MD

Principal Investigator

Massachusetts General Hospital

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Vibrotactile Stimulation With Saphenus Device | 临床试验