Efficacy of an Innovative Kinesiotaping Bandage Compared to Traditional Tape in Stabilising Ankle Inversion and Plantar Flexion in Triathletes.

Not Applicable

Completed

• Conditions: Athletes

• Registration Number: NCT06701994
• Lead Sponsor: University of Vigo

Brief Summary

Efficacy of an Innovative Kinesiotaping Bandage Compared to Traditional Tape in Stabilising Ankle Inversion and Plantar Flexion in Triathletes: A Triple-Blind Experimental Study.

Background and Purpose:

Lateral ankle sprains are a common injury among triathletes, impacting their performance and recovery time. Although traditional functional tape is effective in stabilising the ankle joint, it has limitations in aquatic sports due to its lack of water resistance. This study will evaluate the efficacy of an innovative kinesiotaping (KT) bandage, designed to combine water resistance with the restrictive properties of traditional tape. The primary objective will be to determine which type of bandage is more effective in stabilising ankle inversion and plantar flexion in triathletes.

Study Design:

This will be a triple-blind experimental study involving 20 federated triathletes. Each participant will have three different bandages (traditional tape, innovative KT, and placebo) applied in a randomised order. Goniometric and functional tests will be used to measure the outcomes.

Interventions:

Traditional Tape: Standard restrictive bandage. Innovative KT Bandage: Elastic, water-resistant bandage with additional restrictive properties.

Placebo: Gauze bandage without stabilising properties.

Methods of Evaluation:

Goniometric measurements (flexion, inversion) and functional tests (Star Excursion Balance Test, Hopping Test, Vertical Jump Test) will be conducted. The bandages will be applied and evaluated in a controlled environment, with participants and investigators blinded to the type of bandage.

Expected Outcomes:

It is anticipated that the innovative KT bandage will provide stabilisation comparable to traditional tape for critical ankle movements while overcoming the limitations of tape in aquatic conditions. It is also expected to demonstrate significant advantages in functional tests.

Clinical Relevance:

This study aims to provide evidence for optimising the management of ankle injuries in triathletes, offering a practical and effective solution to maintain athletic performance under demanding conditions.

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Study First Submitted: 2024-11-19
• Study First Submitted QC: 2024-11-19
• Study First Posted: 2024-11-22
• Study Start: 2024-11-27
• Primary Completion: 2024-12-08
• Study Completion: 2025-01-30
• Status Verified: 2025-03
• Last Update Submitted: 2025-03-24
• Last Update Posted: 2025-03-28

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: COMPLETED
• Sex: Male
• Target Recruitment: 20

Inclusion Criteria

• Adult men (over 18 years old).
• Federated triathletes.
• No medical conditions or pathologies that could affect the measurements.
• Signed informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

• Recent surgeries that compromise ankle function.
• Severe prior ankle injuries (fractures, ligament tears).
• Presence of chronic musculoskeletal diseases.
• Use of ankle support devices during the tests.
• History of severe dermatological allergies or intolerance to the materials used in the bandages.
• Use of supplements or medications that could influence muscular or joint performance.

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: CROSSOVER

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Ankle Goniometry	From enrollment to the end of measurements, approximately one hour	The ankle's range of motion was evaluated, including dorsiflexion, plantar flexion, eversion, and inversion. Three measurements were taken for each movement, and their mean value was calculated using a GemRed® digital goniometer. The procedure was conducted while ensuring the patient's proper positioning and aligning the instrument with anatomical reference points.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Star Excursion Balance Test	From enrollment to the end of measurements, approximately one hour.	Dynamic postural control was evaluated through a test in which participants, while maintaining balance on their dominant foot, had to reach the furthest point in each of the eight directions of a star. Distances were measured from the centre of the supporting foot to the tip of the opposite foot. To obtain a general indicator of dynamic balance performance, the average of the distances reached in all directions was calculated.
Hopping Test	From enrollment to the end of measurements, approximately one hour.	The Hopping Test evaluates dynamic balance and agility on uneven surfaces. Participants perform a hopping sequence over elevated squares tilted at a 15° angle. The task involves completing a course by hopping back and forth across eight marked squares as quickly as possible, maintaining balance and control. The total time required to complete the course is recorded as the performance outcome. This test assesses functional stability and proprioception under challenging conditions.
Vertical Jump Test	From enrollment to the end of measurements, approximately one hour.	The Vertical Jump Test measures explosive lower-limb strength and power. Participants perform two types of jumps: a countermovement jump and a squat jump from a static position. A force platform records flight time and calculates jump height for each attempt. The test evaluates the participant's ability to generate power in vertical motion, providing insights into muscular performance and functional capacity. Results are analysed to compare performance across conditions.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Pontevedra; 🇪🇸 Pontevedra, Spain