MedPath

Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback in Older Adults

Early Phase 1
Completed
Conditions
Older Adult
Interventions
Behavioral: OSC-
Behavioral: OSC+
Registration Number
NCT05902286
Lead Sponsor
Brigham Young University
Brief Summary

Older adults will be randomly assigned to an active heart rate variability biofeedback condition and a "sham" control condition. Stress recovery measures and emotional and cognitive functioning will be assessed before and following the five-week intervention to assess potential changes from the intervention.

Detailed Description

The goal of the current study is to compare heart rate variability biofeedback in an older adults study. The primary aims of the paper are to test whether there will be differences between HRV measurements pre- to post-intervention for HRV outcomes, stress recovery, and emotional and cognitive outcome measures. The investigators will implement an active HRVB condition and a control condition that utilizes methods developed by Yoo and colleagues. The "sham" control condition is designed to decrease the syncing of the baroreceptors and respiratory sinus arrhythmia and decrease heart rate oscillations. The target sample will be 50 older adults 65 years and older that will be randomized into the two groups.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
59
Inclusion Criteria
  • Fluent English speaker
  • Able to provide informed consent
  • 65 years or Older
Exclusion Criteria
  • Symptoms within the last year of a neurological disorder (e.g., dementia, stroke, epilepsy, traumatic brain injury with loss of consciousness in the last year, etc.).
  • Conditions that might affect the biofeedback training (i.e., pacemakers, previous self-reported heart attack with hospitalization, self-reported coronary artery disease)
  • Currently engaged in or have been previously trained in heart rate variability biofeedback.
  • 3.3 or higher on the IQCODE.
  • Currently prescribed and taking beta-blockers.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
OSC-OSC-Similarly, for the Osc- procedures, the client will be required to complete a five-week intervention. Participants will be instructed that the purpose of this portion of the study is to decrease their breathing oscillations. A program was designed by Yoo and colleagues that gives feedback regarding a "calmness" score which reflects a better score (i.e., higher) when participants breathe in a pattern that elicits less variability (i.e., less oscillations). They will be asked to complete four 20-minute homework assignments at home and asked to come up with techniques to decrease their heart rate.
OSC+OSC+The 25 participants assigned to the OSC+ condition will complete a five-week intervention for the Osc+ portion of the study using emWave software for biofeedback. There will be one 30-60 minute in-person HRVB session once a week completed at the University Parkway Center. In addition to the in-person session, the participant will complete four 20-minute homework sessions during the following week. The format of five weeks of one weekly session and four homework sessions is effective at helping participants learn and implement breathing and biofeedback skills. The five HRVB session will be based on the Lehrer and colleagues' protocol.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Resting HRV Change Following InterventionThrough study completion, an average of 7 weeks.

The second primary aim of the study will be to test the utility of HRVB compared to sham control in improving HRV following a stressor in older adults using a randomized trial design.

Stress Recovery Change Following InterventionThrough study completion, an average of 7 weeks.

The first primary aim of the paper is to test whether there will be difference resting HRV measurements pre- to post-intervention.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Emotional Functioning: Geriatric Depression Scale-15Through study completion, an average of 7 weeks.

The researchers are interested in how self-reported depressive symptoms might change following intervention. To assess self-reported depression levels, all participants will be administered the Geriatric Depression Scale-15. The questionnaire scoring has four ranges reflecting depression severity: 0-4 (normal), 5-8 (mild); 9-11 (moderate); 12-15 (severe).

Cognitive FunctioningThrough study completion, an average of 7 weeks.

An additional aim of the study is to evaluate whether improvements in HRV in older adults following HRVB are associated with objective and subjective improvements in cognitive functioning (i.e., attention, inhibitory control). The investigators will be using the National Institute of Health (NIH) Toolkit to assess cognitive functioning.

Emotional Functioning: Satisfaction with Life ScaleThrough study completion, an average of 7 weeks.

One of the secondary aims is to evaluate whether change in HRV in older adults following HRVB are associated with subjective change in life satisfaction. To understand change in life satisfaction, researchers will have participants complete the Satisfaction with Life Scale during pre and post intervention testing sessions. The scale has a range of 5-35 with 5-9 representing extreme dissatisfaction with life and 31-35 with extremely satisfied with life.

Emotional Functioning: Scale of Positive and Negative EmotionsThrough study completion, an average of 7 weeks.

As further evidence of potential changes in self-reported emotional functioning, all participants will complete the Scale of Positive and Negative Emotions. The scale results in a summed positive and negative score that ranges from 6 to 30 that will both be considered in analyses.

Emotional Functioning: Depression and Stress Anxiety ScaleThrough study completion, an average of 7 weeks.

Lastly, to assess both self-reported depression and anxiety all participants will complete the Depression and Anxiety Stress Scale to examine potential changes following intervention. The questionnaire scoring has four separate ranges for depression, stress, and anxiety. Specifically, depression severity ranges included: 0-9 (normal), 10-13 (mild); 14-20 (moderate), 21-27 (severe), 28+ (extremely severe). Stress severity ranges included: 0-14 (normal), 15-18 (mild), 19-25 (moderate), 26-33 (severe), 34+ (extremely severe). Lastly, the anxiety ranges are 0-7 (normal), 8-9 (mild), 10-14 (moderate),15-19 (severe), 20+ (extremely severe).

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Brigham Young Unversity

🇺🇸

Provo, Utah, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath