Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT00750984
NCT00750984CompletedNot Applicable

A Comparison of Two Different Surgical Techniques for Total Hip Resurfacing

Zimmer Biomet1 site in 1 country49 target enrollmentStarted: September 1, 2008Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
49
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
RSA

Study Overview

Brief Summary

This study compares the posterior approach to the anterolateral approach using the ReCap® Total Hip Resurfacing System.

Detailed Description

Theoretical considerations of RECAP procedures through anterolateral trochanteric osteotomy:

  • Less bone resection, less complicated revision surgery.
  • Reduced stress shielding of the femur.
  • Lower incidence of hip dislocations.
  • Walking function improved by change in mobilisation regime and operative technique.
  • Risk of femoral neck fracture is reduced by preoperative measurement of bone density.
  • Risk of avascular necrosis of the femoral head is reduced with the anterolateral approach preserving femoral head blood supply and preventing later failure of the implant.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
29 Years to 61 Years (Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Primary hip OA
  • •Secondary hip OA due to mild and moderate acetabular dysplasia
  • •Sufficient bone quality for cementless acetabular component
  • •Suited for resurfacing of the femoral head (pre- and intraoperatively assessed)
  • •>29 years
  • •<61 years

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Neuromuscular or vascular diseases in affected leg
  • •Patients found intra-operatively to be unsuited for a cementless acetabular component or cementing of the femoral component
  • •Need of NSAID post-operatively
  • •Fracture sequelae
  • •Females at risk of pregnancy (no safe contraceptives)
  • •Severe hip dysplasia
  • •Sequelae from hip disease in childhood
  • •Medicine with large effect on bone density (K-vitamin antagonists, loop-diuretic)
  • •Alcoholism (females > 14 units per week, males > 21 units per week) AVN
  • •Osteoporosis

Arms & Interventions

1

Experimental

This arm utilizes the anterolateral approach using the ReCap® Total Hip Resurfacing System.

Intervention: Anterolateral approach (Procedure)

1

Experimental

This arm utilizes the anterolateral approach using the ReCap® Total Hip Resurfacing System.

Intervention: ReCap Total Hip Resurfacing (Device)

2

Active Comparator

This arm utilizes the posterior approach using the ReCap® Total Hip Resurfacing System.

Intervention: Posterior approach (Procedure)

2

Active Comparator

This arm utilizes the posterior approach using the ReCap® Total Hip Resurfacing System.

Intervention: ReCap Total Hip Resurfacing (Device)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

RSA

Time Frame: 1 week, 3 months, 1 year, 2 years, 5 years

Secondary Outcomes

  • Conventional X-ray(1 week)
  • Gait Analysis(1 week, 3 months, 1 year)
  • Microdialysis(1 week)
  • DEXA scan(Pre-operatively, 1 week, 1 year, 2 years)
  • Harris Hip Score(Pre-operatively, 1 week, 6 weeks, 3 months, 1 year)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Industry
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials