Effect Of PRF Versus Xenograft In Closed Sinus Lift.
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Implant or Graft; Rejection
- Interventions
- Other: Prf
- Registration Number
- NCT03684954
- Lead Sponsor
- Mahmoud adel shaaban
- Brief Summary
Indirect sinus lift with used PRF as a graft material versus xenograft
- Detailed Description
Crestal incision and reflect the tissue until exposure of the bone, then use drilling to make osteotomy. Then use sutable osteotomes to elevate the sinus floor, then pack of Prf or bone graft in the osteotomy and implant placement . Then closed the flap and suturing.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 10
Inclusion Criteria
- Edentulous area and bone high at least 5-6 mm below the maxillary sinus at maxillary premolar.
- Good oral hygiene.
Exclusion Criteria
- bad oral hygiene.
- patient with systemic disease that may affect normal healing
- pregnant patients.
- patients with bone diseases and presence of periapical pathology affecting the neighboring teeth.
- Heavy smoker more than 20 cigarettes per day
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Used of PRF in clsed sinus lifting Prf Used of PRF in closed sinus lifting with implant placement
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Primary stability by ostell device up to 3 months Implant stability will be mesured by ostell device, implant stability will be mesured intra operative at 0 ( time of implant placement ) and 2, 4, 6, 10 and 12 weeks after surgery
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method