Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT00827710
NCT00827710CompletedNot Applicable

Automated Diabetes Registry Tools to Enhance Patient Self-Management and Provider Performance Feedback

Denver Health and Hospital Authority1 site in 1 country5,457 target enrollmentStarted: December 1, 2007Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
5,457
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Percent of patients with HgA1c < 7

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Can we improve diabetes outcomes through 1) report card mailings to patients 2) point of care distribution of report cards to patients and 3) provider performance feedback with patient level data?

Detailed Description

Our federally qualified health care center serves over 7000 diabetic patients, many of whom are uninsured (43%) or on medicaid (18%) or medicare (26%). The population is 54% Latino, 25% Caucasian, and 14% African American. We excluded patients older than 75; those without English or Spanish as a first language; and the homeless. The remaining 5457 patients were randomized to this one-year study which ended January 1, 2009. One-half of the enrolled patients received quarterly mailed report cards on their HgA1c, blood pressure, and lipid performance. They were asked to pick from a list of self-management goals and to see their provider if their last visit was more than 2 months prior to the mailing. In a 2x2 design, our eight clinics were randomized to i) on-site printing of patient report cards or no on-site printing and ii) standard provider performance report cards or enhanced provider report cards. The standard provider report cards included data on provider performance on HgA1c, LDL, and blood pressure compared to other providers. The enhanced provider report card also included a list of up to 10 patients not at HgA1c, LDL, or blood pressure goal. The provider report cards were distributed on a quarterly basis, and the point of care patient report cards were distributed at every clinic visit.

We are analyzing the impact of the intervention on the percent of patients at expert recommended goals for glycemic, lipid, and blood pressure control. We are also performing a qualitative analysis to describe provider and patient attitudes toward the interventions.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Factorial
Primary Purpose
Health Services Research
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 75 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •icd9 code for diabetes
  • •primary care visit in the past 18 months
  • •English or Spanish as primary language

Exclusion Criteria

  • •age more than 75
  • •No working address

Arms & Interventions

1

Active Comparator

patients who received point-of-care report cards and were listed on provider performance report card

Intervention: point of care patient report cards (Behavioral)

1

Active Comparator

patients who received point-of-care report cards and were listed on provider performance report card

Intervention: Provider performance report card (Behavioral)

2

Active Comparator

Patients who received point-of-care diabetes report cards but were not listed on provider performance report card

Intervention: point of care patient report cards (Behavioral)

3

Active Comparator

Patients who did not receive point-of-care report card but who were listed on provider performance report card

Intervention: Provider performance report card (Behavioral)

4

No Intervention

Patients who did not receive point of care report card and who did were not listed on provider performance report card

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Percent of patients with HgA1c < 7

Time Frame: january 2009

Percent of patients with LDL < 100 mg/dL

Time Frame: january 2009

Percent of patients with BP < 130/80

Time Frame: january 2009

Secondary Outcomes

  • Percent of patients with A1c checked in last 6 months(january 2009)
  • Percent of patients with LDL checked in past year(january 2009)
  • Percent of patients with BP checked in past year(january 2009)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Henry Fischer

MD

Denver Health and Hospital Authority

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials