MedPath

Effect of Telephone Follow-up on Repeated Suicide Attempt in Patients

Completed
Conditions
Suicide, Attempted
Interventions
Behavioral: suicide attempt
Registration Number
NCT02932709
Lead Sponsor
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne
Brief Summary

Attempted suicide is a major public health problem, and the efficacies of current postvention protocols vary. The investigators evaluated the effectiveness of telephone follow-up of patients referred to an emergency psychiatric unit for attempted suicide on any further attempt/s over the following year.

In a single-center, controlled study with intent to treat, they evaluated the efficacy of a protocol of telephone follow-up of patients at 8, 30, and 60 days after they had been treated for attempted suicide. For comparison, they evaluated as controls patients with similar social and demographic characteristics referred to their emergency psychiatric unit in the year prior to the study who did not receive telephone follow-up after their initial hospitalization. Data were analyzed using logistic regression.

Detailed Description

The importance of suicide and suicidal attempts recurrence is a major public health problem. Indeed, the suicide attempt is one of the most important predictors of suicide, as well as suicidal relapse is considered a suicide risk factor. It is therefore essential to establish the suicidal relapse prevention devices.

Moreover, the consensus conference on suicidal crisis (6) in particular stresses the importance of organizing continuity of care and foster a therapeutic alliance to avoid a break in continuity of care.

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of telephone Callback patients on suicide rate of recurrence at 6 months of suicidal gesture. A secondary objective is to assess and promote compliance.

Patients were included after a psychiatric interview following a suicide attempt in the North hospital's emergency unit no emergency hospitalization or indication in the interview before the release of the psychiatric emergency service. The interview provides an assessment of suicide risk and oral information about the protocol. A map showing the coordinates of the psychiatric emergency service and a reminder of the protocol is given. A consent form is signed. This protocol does not replace the usual care.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
876
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patient affiliated or entitled to a social security scheme
  • Patient who have attempted suicide regardless of the medium
  • Patient falling 4 psychiatric sectors covered by the CHU of Saint-Etienne
  • Major and minor Patient (with parental permission)
  • Patient for which there is no evidence of psychiatric hospitalization sector or clinic immediately after switching to the suicidal act
Exclusion Criteria
  • Homeless Patient
  • Patients for whom Callback is not possible (no phone, incarceration ...)
  • Patient who do not speak French
  • Patient admitted sector or clinic following the psychiatric interview inclusion
  • Patient Refusal
  • Medical Reason
  • Deleterious character of recontact by a doctor of the psychiatric emergency after passing the act

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Patients admitted of Psychiatrysuicide attemptOnly patients who had a suicide attempt admitted to the Department of Emergency Psychiatry.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Comparison of suicidal recurrence rate6 months

Number of relapses of suicide attempts per patient over a period of 6 months.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Assess the impact of the device on the number of deaths by suicide6 months

Number of deaths by suicide

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Chu Saint-Etienne

🇫🇷

SAINt-ETIENNE, France

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath