跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05386082
NCT05386082已完成不适用

Development of a Standardized Set of Core Metrics to Assess the Quality of Anesthesia, Perioperative Care, and Acute Pain Management in Canada: Scoping Review and Multidisciplinary Consensus Delphi Study

University of British Columbia3 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 80 人开始时间: 2022年9月26日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
80
试验地点
3
主要终点
Ranked list of anesthesia, perioperative care, and acute pain management quality metrics

研究概览

简要总结

To develop a ranked list of up to 20 metrics, which can be used to evaluate the quality of anesthesia, perioperative care, and acute pain management for adult inpatient non-cardiac surgical patients for use in quality improvement and quality assurance, research, and continuing medical education in the Canadian care context.

详细描述

Background: Improving anesthesiology care and perioperative outcomes is a growing field encompassing quality improvement and quality assurance, research, and continuing medical education. Multiple consensus initiatives have standardized perioperative endpoints. However, no standard set of metrics exist to evaluate the quality of Canadian anesthesiology care delivery.

Objective

Develop a ranked list of up to 20 metrics, which can be used to evaluate the quality of anesthesia, perioperative care, and acute pain management for adult inpatient non-cardiac surgical patients for use in quality improvement and quality assurance, research, and continuing medical education in the Canadian care context.

Methods: First, the steering committee will conduct a scoping review of the literature to identify candidate metrics, according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) and Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews. Metrics will include patient-reported outcome and patient-reported experience measures, quality and safety indicators, process metrics, and Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society recommended practice standards. The search strategy will include English-language articles published or in use within the past seven years (2015/Jan-2022/March) in 1) MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2) grey literature, including guidelines, and 3) existing evaluation metrics used by Canadian departments for quality assurance and improvement. Screening and data extraction will be performed by two independent reviewers using Covidence.

Next, following approval from the Research Ethics Board and with written informed consent from participants, a multidisciplinary panel of anesthesiologists, people with lived surgical experience (patients, caregivers), surgeons, nurses, internal medicine and family physicians, hospital administrators, and researchers will iteratively review the list of candidate metrics using a modified Delphi process. Independent voting, using surveys over three rounds, will be used to identify the most important metrics to define the quality of anesthesia, perioperative care, and acute pain management. Additional cycles may be performed if required.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Ecologic Or Community
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patient/family participants must have undergone a surgical experience within the past three years, and have the capacity to provide informed consent.
  • All other participants must be actively practising in Canada in the disciplines they represent.

排除标准

  • Participants with self-declared conflicts of interest with this project.

结局指标

主要结局

Ranked list of anesthesia, perioperative care, and acute pain management quality metrics

时间窗: late 2022

A ranked set of national consensus metrics for evaluating the quality of anesthesia, perioperative care, and acute pain management for adult noncardiac surgical patients that can be used for quality improvement and quality assurance, research, and continuing medical education in the Canadian care context. Metrics where \>70% participants voted "definitely priority" will be marked in the publication as the core metric set.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Matthias Görges, PhD

Associate Professor

University of British Columbia

研究点 (3)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Anesthesia Core Quality Metrics Consensus Delphi... | 临床试验