跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03480867
NCT03480867撤回1 期

Pre-operative Radiation Therapy (RT) and Temozolomide (TMZ) in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma. A Phase I Study. (PARADIGMA)

McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家开始时间: 2017年3月最近更新:
适应症
干预措施
相关药物

试验速览

阶段
1 期
状态
撤回
发起方
试验地点
1
主要终点
To assess toxicity of the regimen

研究概览

简要总结

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary brain cancer in adults. Despite surgery, conventional radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, the average survival for GBM is 15-16 months. Although additional chemoradiotherapy has been shown to increase survival, the majority recur at the original location.

Despite many efforts to improve the local control by improving surgical techniques, increasing the radiotherapy dose or adding newer chemotherapy agents, these attempts have failed to show a survival benefit or an improved cancer control. People who are not participating in a study are usually treated with surgery followed by radiation (6 weeks duration) together with temozolomide (chemotherapy drug) followed by temozolomide alone. For patients who receive this usual treatment approach for this cancer, about 4 out of 100 are free of cancer growth five years later. Because GBM invades the surrounding normal brain, this study is looking into the possibility of minimizing invasion by starting treatment using the combination of radiotherapy and chemotherapy prior to surgery. This approach is an experimental form of treatment and the diagnosis is based exclusively on imaging and not on histology of the tumour tissue, and there is a possibility that your tumor may not be a GB but of other origins.

详细描述

One of the deadly properties of GBM is its capacity to diffusely infiltrate the surrounding normal brain tissue. Unlikely many malignancies, in GBM local disease progression, rather than metastatic disease, is the leading cause of death. Extent of resection plays a key role in the treatment of these patients with complete surgical resection improving outcome. In a prospective, non- interventional, multi-institutional study of over 140 patients with GBM and minimal or no residual tumor on post-operative MRI, Stummer et al.have shown that extent of resection is indeed associated with improved survival. However, despite evidence of complete resection on post-operative imaging studies, surgery is rarely truly complete. GBMs are invasive tumors and, at time of surgery, a clear boundary is not clearly identifiable, either on pre- or intra- operative imaging. Even when sophisticated imaging'techniques are used, they are unable to detect invasive brain cancer cell for proper pre-operative surgical planning to optimally delineate the tumor boundaries for a truly complete resection. Even if they were, brain eloquence would preclude a complete resection of most GBMs.

Despite extensive and complete surgical tumor removal coupled with radiation and chemotherapy, even in high doses, 90% of patients still fail at the border or within a few centimeters from the surgical cavity. Glioma cell migration outside the original tumor site may be responsible for this recurrence pattern. Cell migration is a complex, dynamic process and is well-documented in GBM. It involves, at least, 3 independent but coordinated biologic processes: 1) cell adhesion to components of the extracellular matrix, 2) cell's own motility and 3) invasion. Giese et al.) reported that cell migration is established by several independent mechanisms, facilitating the spread of tumor astrocytes, but with cell motility being the possible common denominator for this biologic behavior.

Invasion of tumor glioma cells is a multi-factorial process. To migrate, the cell needs a change in morphology and to interact with the extracellular matrix. It is possible that the surgical insult at the time of tumor removal may facilitate such an environment. Also, Wild-Bode et al.(6) have shown, in animal models, that sub-lethal doses of irradiation promote the migration and invasiveness of glioma cells. It is conceivable that the use of conventionally fractionated radiation therapy (2 Gy per day), even in doses above 60 Gy, leads to only sub-lethal damage potentially promoting cell migration.

In a recently completed Phase 2 study for patients with newly diagnosed GBM, our group has shown that the use of concurrent temozolomide and hypofractionated radiation therapy to a dose of 60 Gy given in 20 fractions (daily dose of 3 Gy) preceded by 2 weeks of temozolomide given in the post-operative setting was associated with 2-year survival rates of 63% and 29% for MGMT methylated and unmethylated tumors, respectively (Dr. G. Shenouda, personal information. Manuscript submitted for publication). These promising results may be possibly due to a dual effect of the use of neoadjuvant temozolomide (prior to radiation therapy) and the use of a hypofractionated radiotherapy regimen. The upfront use of temozolomide may have affected tumor control by interfering with the upstream signaling event triggered by the RT preventing cell migration and also by promoting inhibition of glioma cell invasion.

GBMs are one of the most rapidly growing tumors. Primary GBMs typically develop and grow to be greater than 3 cm in less than 4 months. Under the current standard treatment approach, patients undergo surgery and, rather than starting adjuvant therapy immediately at a moment when there is the least amount of residual tumor burden, they wait 3-4 weeks, for practical reasons, to start adjuvant treatment with RT and TMZ. In addition, the combined treatment takes an additional 6 weeks to complete. Thus it takes 9-10 weeks for patients to complete maximum local treatment. In other words, one of the most aggressive tumors has been given another 9-10 weeks to proliferate, repopulate and invade. It is conceivable that this delay in adjuvant treatment gives the residual brain cancer cells the opportunity to regrow and invade prior to completion of RT and TMZ thus contributing to 85% of all failures occurring at or within 2 cm of the original resection cavity margin.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Na
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • 未提供

排除标准

  • Tumors within 1 cm from critical structures (brainstem, optic apparatus), or with massive edema, or with the possibility of herniation, or any tumor that in the neurosurgeon's opinion would be considered unsafe to delay surgery or is not grossly resectable.
  • Prior invasive malignancy (except for non-melanomatous skin cancer, non- invasive bladder cancer, and non-invasive cervix cancer) unless disease free for 2:5 years.
  • Recurrent or multifocal GBM.
  • Any site of metastatic disease (drop metastases).
  • Prior chemotherapy or radiation therapy to the head or neck (except for T1 glottic tumor
  • Severe active co-morbid medical condition as assessed by medical team.
  • Patients enrolled in any other protocol.
  • Inability to undergo MRI.

研究组 & 干预措施

Pre-operative RT and TMZ

Experimental
  • Single Arm: Pre-operative Radiation +Temozolomide followed by Surgery plus six cycles of Temozolomide

干预措施: Temozolomide (Drug)

Pre-operative RT and TMZ

Experimental
  • Single Arm: Pre-operative Radiation +Temozolomide followed by Surgery plus six cycles of Temozolomide

干预措施: Pre-Operative Radiation (Radiation)

结局指标

主要结局

To assess toxicity of the regimen

时间窗: one year

Toxicity will be assessed and graded using CTCAE V. 4.03

次要结局

  • Number of patients completing the study treatment(one year.)

研究者

发起方
McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Valerie Panet-Raymond

Principal Investigator

McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验