Disrupt PAD BTK II Study With the Shockwave Peripheral IVL System
- Conditions
- Peripheral Artery Disease
- Registration Number
- NCT05007925
- Lead Sponsor
- Shockwave Medical, Inc.
- Brief Summary
To assess the continued safety, effectiveness, and optimal clinical use of the Shockwave Medical Peripheral IVL System for the treatment of calcified, stenotic BTK arteries.
Post-market, prospective , multi-center, single-arm study.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 250
- General Inclusion Criteria
-
Age of subject is ≥ 18.
-
Subject is able and willing to comply with all assessments in the study.
-
Subject or subject's legal representative has been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to participate, and has signed the approved consent form.
-
Critical limb ischemia (CLI) in the target limb from the distal segment (P3) of the popliteal artery to the ankle joint prior to the study procedure with Rutherford Category 4-5; or Rutherford 3 in the target limb from the distal segment (P3) of the popliteal artery to the ankle joint prior to the study procedure.
-
Estimated life expectancy >1 year.
- Angiographic Inclusion Criteria
-
Up to 2 below-the-knee target lesion(s) in native vessels in one or both limbs.
-
Target lesion reference vessel diameter (RVD) between 2.0 mm and 4.0 mm by investigator visual estimate.
-
Target lesion with ≥70% stenosis by investigator visual estimate.
-
Target lesion length is ≤200 mm by investigator visual estimate. Target lesion can be all or part of the 200 mm treated zone.
-
Distal reconstitution of at least one pedal vessel (<50% stenosis) (desert foot excluded).
-
Evidence of at least moderate calcification at the target lesion site by angiography/IVUS OR non-dilatable lesion indicating presence of calcium. Must meet one of the following:
- Angiography requires fluoroscopic evidence of calcification on parallel sides of the vessel and extending > 50% the length of the lesion.
- IVUS requires presence of ≥270 degrees of calcium over the course of at least 10mm.
- Non-dilatable lesion requires attempted treatment with PTA during the index procedure with residual stenosis > 50% and no serious angiographic complications.
- General Exclusion Criteria
-
Rutherford Category 0, 1, 2 or 6 (target limb).
-
Osteomyelitis or deep soft tissue infection extending proximal from the metatarsals that cannot be treated with an individual toe ray amputation or transmetatarsal amputation (TMA) .
-
History of endovascular or surgical procedure on the target limb within the last 30 days, or planned within 30 days of the index procedure.
-
Subject in whom antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy is contraindicated.
-
Subject has known allergy to contrast agents or medications used to perform endovascular intervention that cannot be adequately pre-treated.
-
Subject has known allergy to urethane, nylon, or silicone.
-
Myocardial infarction within 30 days prior to enrollment.
-
History of stroke within 60 days prior to enrollment.
-
Subject has acute or chronic renal disease with eGFR <30 ml/min/1.73 m2 (using CKD-EPI formula), unless on renal replacement therapy.
-
Subject is pregnant or nursing.
-
Subject is participating in another research study involving an investigational agent (pharmaceutical, biologic, or medical device) that has not reached the primary endpoint.
-
Subject has other medical, social or psychological problems that, in the opinion of the investigator, preclude them from receiving this treatment, and the procedures and evaluations pre- and post-treatment.
-
Covid-19 diagnosis within 90 days.
-
The planned use of cutting/scoring balloons, re-entry or atherectomy devices in target lesions during the index procedure.
-
Planned major amputation (of either leg).
-
Acute limb ischemia.
-
Occlusion of all the inframalleolar outflow arteries/vessels (i.e., desert foot).
-
Subject has an anticipated life span of less than one (1) year.
-
Subject already enrolled into this study.
- Angiographic Exclusion Criteria
-
Failure to treat clinically significant inflow lesions in the ipsilateral iliac, femoral, or popliteal arteries with ≤30% residual stenosis, and no serious angiographic complications (e.g., embolism).
-
Failure to successfully treat significant non-target infra-popliteal lesions prior to treatment of target lesion(s). Successful treatment is defined as obtaining ≤50% residual stenosis with no serious angiographic complications (e.g., embolism ).
-
Failed PTA in target lesion during index procedure with angiographic evidence of serious angiographic complications .
-
Target lesion includes in-stent restenosis.
-
Evidence of aneurysm or thrombus in target vessel.
-
No calcium or mild calcium in the target lesion.
-
Target lesion within native or synthetic vessel grafts.
-
Failure to successfully cross the guidewire across the target lesion; successful crossing defined as tip of the guidewire distal to the target lesion in the absence of flow limiting dissections or perforations.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Procedure Success At procedure Procedure Success defined as ≤50% residual stenosis for all treated target lesions without serious angiographic complications (flow-limiting dissection, perforation, distal embolization, or acute vessel closure) as assessed by the angiographic core lab
Major Adverse Limb Events (MALE) + Post-Operative Death (POD) 30 days Major Adverse Limb Events (MALE) + Post-Operative Death (POD) at 30 days defined as a composite of:
* all-cause death
* above-ankle amputation of the index limb
* major reintervention (new bypass graft, jump/interposition graft revision, or thrombectomy/thrombolysis) of the index limb involving a BTK artery
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Serious angiographic complications At procedure Serious angiographic complications (flow-limiting dissection, perforation, distal embolization, or acute vessel closure) as assessed by the angiographic core lab
Clinically Relevant Target Lesion Failure (CR-TLF) 30 days, 6, 12 & 24 months Clinically Relevant Target Lesion Failure (CR-TLF) at 30 days, 6, 12 \& 24 months defined as a composite of:
* CD-TLR
* Ischemia-related major amputation
* Clinically relevant target lesion occlusionMajor Adverse Events (MAE) 30 days Major Adverse Events (MAE) at 30 days defined as a composite of:
* Need for emergency surgical revascularization of target limb
* Unplanned target limb major amputation (above the ankle)
* Symptomatic thrombus or distal emboli that require surgical, mechanical, or pharmacologic means to improve flow, and extend hospitalization
* Perforations that require an intervention, including bail-out stentingAnkle-brachial index (ABI) or toe-brachial index (TBI) 30 days, 6, 12 & 24 months Ankle-brachial index (ABI) or toe-brachial index (TBI) at 30 days, 6, 12 \& 24 months, reported as change from baseline
Primary Patency 6 and 12 months Primary Patency at 6 and 12 months defined as the absence of both total occlusion (100% diameter stenosis by DUS) in all of the target lesions in a flow pathway, as well as a Clinically-Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (CD-TLR)
VascuQoL 30 days, 6, 12 & 24 months Quality of Life (QoL) assessed by VascuQoL questionnaire at 30 days, 6, 12 \& 24 months, reported as change from baseline
Lesion Success At procedure Lesion Success defined as final residual stenosis ≤50% in the target lesion without significant angiographic complications as assessed by the angiographic core lab
Rutherford Category 30 days, 6, 12 & 24 months Rutherford Category at 30 days, 6, 12 \& 24 months, reported as change from baseline
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (43)
UCSF Fresno
🇺🇸Fresno, California, United States
Scripps Memorial Hospital
🇺🇸La Jolla, California, United States
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
🇺🇸Los Angeles, California, United States
Stanford Hospital
🇺🇸Palo Alto, California, United States
UC Davis Health
🇺🇸Sacramento, California, United States
St. Helena Hospital
🇺🇸Saint Helena, California, United States
MedStar Washington Hospital Center
🇺🇸Washington, District of Columbia, United States
Tallahassee Memorial Hospital
🇺🇸Tallahassee, Florida, United States
Piedmont Heart Institute
🇺🇸Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Rush University Medical Center
🇺🇸Chicago, Illinois, United States
Scroll for more (33 remaining)UCSF Fresno🇺🇸Fresno, California, United States