MedPath

Evaluation of Superior Rectal Arterial Embolization in Hemorrhoidal Disease

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Hemorrhoids
Interventions
Procedure: Rubber band ligatures (RBL)
Procedure: Superior Rectal Artery Embolization (SRAE)
Procedure: Doppler-Guided Hemorrhoidal Artery Ligation (DG-HAL)
Registration Number
NCT05697562
Lead Sponsor
Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel
Brief Summary

SRAE is a promising treatment of bleeding HD as a minimally invasive approach without sphincter damage nor direct mucosal anorectal trauma. Feasibility, efficacy and safety were studied in several trials. A randomized controlled study should confirm the benefits of this technique and will define its therapeutic role in HD.

Embolization and DG-HAL are based on the same concept of vascular occlusion of hemorrhoidal branches of the rectal artery. Furthermore, DG-HAL and RBL are equally effective procedures. The assumption is that treatment with SRAE is not inferior in comparison to RBL or DG HAL in respectively patients without or with antiplatelet/anticoagulation therapy in terms of symptom control and bleeding (non-inferiority study).

Detailed Description

Hemorrhoidal disease (HD) is the most common anorectal pathology. Therapeutic management of HD ranges from conservative treatment and instrumental treatment to surgical approach. Beside these, certain minimally invasive techniques such as radiofrequency ablation, laser coagulation and Superior Rectal Artery Embolization (SRAE) are gaining interest. SRAE is a promising treatment of bleeding HD as a minimally invasive approach without sphincter damage nor direct mucosal anorectal trauma. Feasibility, efficacy and safety were studied in several trials. A randomized controlled study should confirm the benefits of this technique and will define its therapeutic role in HD. Embolization and DG-HAL are based on the same concept of vascular occlusion of hemorrhoidal branches of the rectal artery. Furthermore, DG-HAL and RBL are equally effective procedures. The assumption is that treatment with SRAE is not inferior in comparison to RBL or DG HAL in respectively patients without or with antiplatelet/anticoagulation therapy in terms of symptom control and bleeding (non-inferiority study).

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
80
Inclusion Criteria
  • All patients referred for Hemorrhoidal disease with bleeding are eligible. Significant bleeding is defined as a HBS of ≥ 5.
  • Age > 18 years old;
  • Sexes eligible for study: all
  • Hemorrhoidal disease grade I-III according the Goligher classification with rectal bleeding as predominant symptom
  • History of prior instrumental treatment of HD does not prohibit inclusion
  • Able to understand and read Dutch, French or English
Exclusion Criteria
  • Permanent hemorrhoidal prolapse/grade IV hemorrhoidal disease
  • Rectal prolapse
  • History of proctological surgery for HD
  • Acute complicated course of HD i.e. acute thrombosis (fluxio hemorrhoidalis or perianal hematoma)
  • Anal stenosis, congenital of acquired
  • Chronic anal fissure
  • Active rectal inflammation, including peri-anal abscess (e.g. Inflammatory Bowel Disease, infectious,...)
  • History of colorectal or anal cancer
  • History of rectal or sigmoidal resection
  • Portal hypertension and liver cirrhosis Child Pugh C
  • Radiation rectitis
  • Neurological disease involving anal sphincter musculature
  • Severe psychiatric disorder
  • Pregnancy
  • Allergy to iodinated contrast agents
  • Colorectal neoplasia as the cause of bleeding (excluded with a (virtual) colonoscopy in the last year)

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
no anticoagulation group with RBLRubber band ligatures (RBL)-
anticoagulation group with SRAESuperior Rectal Artery Embolization (SRAE)-
anticoagulation group with DG HALDoppler-Guided Hemorrhoidal Artery Ligation (DG-HAL)-
no anticoagulation group with SRAESuperior Rectal Artery Embolization (SRAE)-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
symptom controlfrom baseline to 3 months

the main objective is to control the symptoms, for this the Hemorrhoidal Bleeding Score is to be used

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
prevalence of fecal incontinencefrom baseline till 12 months

a secondary objective is to report the prevalence of fecal incontinence, this will be measured using the Jorge-wexner score

Symptom controlfrom baseline to 12 months

a secondary objective is to control the symptoms, for this the Hemorrhoidal Bleeding Score is to be used

prevalence of re-interventionsfrom baseline till 12 months

a secondary objective is to report the prevalence of re-interventions, this will be measured among others with the pain score reported by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

Patient reported effectivenessfrom baseline till 12 months

a secondary objective is to report patient effectiveness, this will be measured using the 5-level EQ-5D-5L score

prevalence of complicationsfrom baseline till 12 months

a secondary objective is to report the prevalence of complications, this will be measured using among others the pain score reported by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

clinical effectivenessfrom baseline till 12 months

a secondary objective is to report clinical effectiveness, this will be measured using the Goligher score

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

UZ Brussel

🇧🇪

Jette, Belgium

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath