Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03736083
NCT03736083
Withdrawn
Not Applicable

Introducing Continuous Glucose Monitoring Technology at Diagnosis in Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes: A Proof of Concept Study

University of Florida0 sitesSeptember 2019

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Type1diabetes
Sponsor
University of Florida
Primary Endpoint
Change in Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire- Parent version
Status
Withdrawn
Last Updated
6 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

Diabetes technology is changing and has quickly become an integral part of diabetes care and management. The study team plans to study the effects of introducing technology to newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes patients. The investigators hypothesize that early access to continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) technology will potentially improve satisfaction scores, hemoglobin A1c, glycemic control, reduce hypoglycemia, and ease the burden of disease when compared to new onset patients who receive standard of care access to CGM.

Detailed Description

Abstract: Diabetes technology is changing and has quickly become an integral part of diabetes care and management. Typically, patients will need to wait months due to paperwork, insurance, and logistical issues before utilizing these technologies. With this project, the investigators plan to study the effects of introducing technology to newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes patients. It is hypothesized that early access to flash continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) technology will improve scores in diabetes's measures. The primary outcome with be the parent version of the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ). Secondary outcomes will include other diabetes measures such as DTSQ teen version, Hypoglycemia Fear Survey (HFS)- Parent and child version, Diabetes Distress Survey (DDS)-parent version, PedsQL- parent and child versions. The study team will also look at other diabetes outcomes including A1c, time in range, and reduction in hypoglycemia. Background: Type 1 diabetes is a complex disease requiring newly diagnosed pediatric patients and families to learn how to check blood glucoses, inject insulin, count carbohydrates, treat hypoglycemia/hyperglycemia, and perform many other complex tasks, all within the first few days after diagnosis. Continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) and flash glucose monitors have emerged as important diabetes technologies towards providing improved care and easing the burden of disease. These technologies are most typically introduced to families in the outpatient setting 2-3 months following diagnosis due to logistical issues related to insurance coverage. Barriers to access include requirements for insurance prior authorization, lack of immediate availability at local pharmacies, need for patient training, and the historical bias towards requiring finger stick glucose monitoring as the basis for diabetes management. Despite these barriers, the data supports the observation that CGM technology provides for better understanding of diabetes, improved quality of life for parents and children, reduced frequency of hypoglycemia, and improved A1c. This project will potentially show the feasibility of introducing these technologies at diagnosis. New onset type 1 diabetes patients will be randomized to receive either a Freestyle Libre flash glucose monitoring system immediately at diagnosis or to delayed use of CGM (standard of care).

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
September 2019
End Date
October 2020
Last Updated
6 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Diagnosis of type 1 diabetes mellitus

Exclusion Criteria

  • No diagnosis of type 1 diabetes mellitus

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Change in Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire- Parent version

Time Frame: 2 weeks,3 months, and 12 months

Survey for Diabetes treatment satisfaction: 14 question survey with each question scaled from 0-6; with 0 being 'very dissatisfied' and 4 being 'very satisfied'

Secondary Outcomes

  • Change in Pediatric Quality of Life Survey- Parent and child versions(2 weeks,3 months, and 12 months)
  • Change in Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire- Teen version(2 weeks,3 months, and 12 months)
  • Change in Diabetes Distress Survey- Parent version(2 weeks,3 months, and 12 months)
  • Change in Glycemic control measured by A1c(3 and 12 months)
  • Change in Problem Areas in Diabetes survey(2 weeks,3 months, and 12 months)
  • Change in Hypoglycemia Fear Survey - Parent and Child Versions(2 weeks,3 months, and 12 months)

Similar Trials