Comparative study between the analgesic efficacy of pectoralis major block II VS erector spinae blocks VS paravertebral blocks in postoperative analgesia in Modified Radical Mastectomy
Not Applicable
Completed
- Conditions
- CancerAnaesthesia
- Registration Number
- PACTR202309889843982
- Lead Sponsor
- Faculty of medicine Ain Shams University
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Complete
- Sex
- Female
- Target Recruitment
- 150
Inclusion Criteria
• Patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy.
•ASA physical status I to II
•Sex (females)
•Age 30-70 years.
Exclusion Criteria
•Hypersensitivity to local anesthetics.
•Infection near site of infections
•Patient refusal.
•Coagulopathy, use of anticoagulants or antiplatelets.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
What molecular mechanisms underlie the analgesic effects of pectoralis major block II in post-mastectomy pain management?
How does the efficacy of erector spinae blocks compare to paravertebral blocks for postoperative analgesia in breast cancer surgery?
Are there specific biomarkers that predict optimal response to regional anesthesia techniques in modified radical mastectomy patients?
What are the potential adverse events associated with pectoralis major block II versus erector spinae and paravertebral blocks in breast cancer surgery?
How do combination approaches of regional blocks enhance postoperative outcomes in cancer patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy?