Efficacy and Tolerance Evaluation of an Antiage Aesthetic Treatment for the Middle and Inferior Third of the Face
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Face Skin Laxity
- Sponsor
- Derming SRL
- Enrollment
- 24
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Photographic documentation (3D pictures)
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 6 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
Primary endpoint of the study is to evaluate clinically and by non-invasive instrumental evaluations the aesthetic performance, on the third middle and inferior of the face, of "MonoDermà HA Bio-revitalizing gel", an intradermal filler containing hyaluronic acid, combined to a low level laser therapy (LLLT) to obtain a stable photo-cross-linking effect inside the dermis.
Investigators
Adele Sparavigna
Principal Investigator
Derming SRL
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •female sex;
- •Caucasian race;
- •non smokers;
- •no alcohol abuse and/or drug use;
- •40-65 years;
- •FVLS 2-4 ;
- •available and able to return to the study site for the post-procedural follow-up examinations;
- •accepting not to change their habits regarding food, physical activity, cosmetic and cleansing products for the face;
- •accepting not to expose their face to strong UV irradiation (UV session and/or sun bathes) during the entire duration of the study, without appropriate sun protection;
- •accepting to sign the informed consent form.
Exclusion Criteria
- •Pregnancy (only for female subjects not in menopause);
- •lactation (only for female subjects not in menopause);
- •alcohol abuse and/or drug use;
- •female subjects not in menopause, who do not use adequate contraceptive precautions in order to avoid pregnancies during the study;
- •female subjects not in menopause, who do not accept to perform the pregnancy test at T0 and T1 (before the 1st and the 2nd aesthetic procedure);
- •Body Mass Index (BMI) variation (± 1) during the study period;
- •having performed face treatments for aesthetic correction (biomaterials implants, face lifting, botox injections, laser, chemical peeling) in the 6 months beginning of the study;
- •having used permanent filler in the past;
- •change in the normal habits regarding food, physical activity, face cosmetic, cleansing and make-up use during the month preceding the test;
- •sensitivity to the test filler or its ingredients, including delayed hypersensitivity to hyaluronic acid and granulomatous reactions (to be assessed by the investigator during the baseline);
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Photographic documentation (3D pictures)
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3)
Three-dimensional pictures of the face taken by VECTRA H1 handheld imaging system.
Face volume variation
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3)
Face volume image analysis was carried on the 3D pictures taken by Vectra H1 thanks to Vectra analysis module (VAM) software
Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) grade variation
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3)
Reduction of wrinkles severity corresponding to a decrease from the baseline of the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) clinical score where: Grade 1 (absent): no visible nasolabial fold; continuous skin line. Grade 2 (mild): shallow but visible nasolabial fold with a slight indentation; minor facial feature. Grade 3 (moderate): moderately deep nasolabial folds; clear facial feature visible at normal appearance but not when stretched. Grade 4 (severe): very long and deep nasolabial folds; prominent facial feature; \<2mm visible fold when stretched. Grade 5 (very severe): extremely deep and long nasolabial fold, detrimental to facial appearance; 2-4 mm visible V-shaped fold when stretched.
Facial Volume Loss Scale (FVLS) grade variation
Time Frame: Baseline (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3)
Reduction of face volume loss corresponding to a decrease from the baseline of the Facial Volume Loss Scale (FVLS) where: Grade 1: Mild flattening or shadowing of one or more facial regions (including the cheek, temple, preauricolar and periorbital areas). No prominent bony landmarks. No visibility of underlying musculature. Grade 2: An intermediate point between grade 1 and grade 3. Grade 3: Moderate concavity of one or more facial regions (including the cheek, temple, preauricolar and periorbital areas. Prominence of bony landmarks. May have visibility of underlying musculature. Grade 4: An intermediate point between grade 3 and grade 5. Grade 5: Severe indentation of one or more facial regions (including the cheek, temple, preauricolar and periorbital areas). Severe prominence of bony landmarks. Clear visibility of underlying musculature.