MedPath

Efficacy Basics of Bihemispheric Motorcortex Stimulation After Stroke

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Stroke
Hemiparesis
Interventions
Device: tDCS
Behavioral: Motor training
Registration Number
NCT01969097
Lead Sponsor
Charite University, Berlin, Germany
Brief Summary

The aim of the study is to investigate whether the combination of bihemispheric ("dual") transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and motor training on 5 consecutive days facilitates motor recovery in chronic stroke. Results will be compared to a matched group of patients undergoing anodal tDCS as well as a control group receiving sham tDCS. Functional and structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before/after the intervention and during a 3 month follow-up will help investigating neural correlates of expected changes in motor function of the affected upper extremity.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
50
Inclusion Criteria
  • chronic stroke (>6 months after stroke)
  • age: 18 to 80 years
  • non-hemorrhagic or hemorrhagic stroke
Exclusion Criteria
  • more than 1 stroke
  • severe alcohol disease or drug abuse, severe psychiatric disease like depression or psychosis
  • severe cognitive deficits
  • severe untreated medical conditions
  • other neurologic diseases
  • severe microangiopathy
  • pregnancy

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Anodal tDCS + motor trainingMotor trainingMotor training of the affected upper extremity combined with anodal tDCS.
Dual tDCS + motor trainingMotor trainingMotor training of the affected upper extremity combined with dual transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS).
Sham tDCS + motor trainingMotor trainingMotor training of the affected upper extremity combined with sham tDCS.
Dual tDCS + motor trainingtDCSMotor training of the affected upper extremity combined with dual transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS).
Anodal tDCS + motor trainingtDCSMotor training of the affected upper extremity combined with anodal tDCS.
Sham tDCS + motor trainingtDCSMotor training of the affected upper extremity combined with sham tDCS.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Motor Function of the Affected Upper Extremitychange from baseline after 3 months

Effects of dual tDCS + training vs sham-tDCS + training on the motor function of the affected upper extremity (measured by standardized behavioral tests).

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Motor Function of the Affected Upper ExtremityAfter 5 days (immediately after intervention), after 3 months vs baseline (before intervention)

Effects of dual tDCS + training vs anodal tDCS + training on the motor function of the affected upper extremity (measured by standardized behavioral tests).

Functional Magnetic Resonance ImagingAfter 5 days (immediately after intervention), after 3 months vs baseline (before intervention)

Effects of dual tDCS + training vs anodal tDCS + training vs sham-tDCS + training on task-specific activations and functional connectivity (measured by functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging, fMRI).

Diffusion Tensor ImagingAfter 5 days (immediately after intervention), after 3 months vs baseline (before intervention)

Effects of dual tDCS + training vs anodal tDCS + training vs sham-tDCS + training on cerebral microstructure (measured by Diffusion Tensor Imaging, DTI).

Transcranial Magnetic StimulationAfter 5 days vs baseline (before intervention)

Effects of dual tDCS + training vs anodal tDCS + training vs sham tDCS + training on excitability of the primary motor cortex (measured by Motor Evoked Potentials, MEP, using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, TMS).

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Charite Universitätsmedizin Berlin

🇩🇪

Berlin, Germany

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath