Efficacy Basics of Bihemispheric Motorcortex Stimulation After Stroke
- Conditions
- StrokeHemiparesis
- Interventions
- Device: tDCSBehavioral: Motor training
- Registration Number
- NCT01969097
- Lead Sponsor
- Charite University, Berlin, Germany
- Brief Summary
The aim of the study is to investigate whether the combination of bihemispheric ("dual") transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and motor training on 5 consecutive days facilitates motor recovery in chronic stroke. Results will be compared to a matched group of patients undergoing anodal tDCS as well as a control group receiving sham tDCS. Functional and structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before/after the intervention and during a 3 month follow-up will help investigating neural correlates of expected changes in motor function of the affected upper extremity.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 50
- chronic stroke (>6 months after stroke)
- age: 18 to 80 years
- non-hemorrhagic or hemorrhagic stroke
- more than 1 stroke
- severe alcohol disease or drug abuse, severe psychiatric disease like depression or psychosis
- severe cognitive deficits
- severe untreated medical conditions
- other neurologic diseases
- severe microangiopathy
- pregnancy
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Anodal tDCS + motor training Motor training Motor training of the affected upper extremity combined with anodal tDCS. Dual tDCS + motor training Motor training Motor training of the affected upper extremity combined with dual transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Sham tDCS + motor training Motor training Motor training of the affected upper extremity combined with sham tDCS. Dual tDCS + motor training tDCS Motor training of the affected upper extremity combined with dual transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Anodal tDCS + motor training tDCS Motor training of the affected upper extremity combined with anodal tDCS. Sham tDCS + motor training tDCS Motor training of the affected upper extremity combined with sham tDCS.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Motor Function of the Affected Upper Extremity change from baseline after 3 months Effects of dual tDCS + training vs sham-tDCS + training on the motor function of the affected upper extremity (measured by standardized behavioral tests).
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Motor Function of the Affected Upper Extremity After 5 days (immediately after intervention), after 3 months vs baseline (before intervention) Effects of dual tDCS + training vs anodal tDCS + training on the motor function of the affected upper extremity (measured by standardized behavioral tests).
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging After 5 days (immediately after intervention), after 3 months vs baseline (before intervention) Effects of dual tDCS + training vs anodal tDCS + training vs sham-tDCS + training on task-specific activations and functional connectivity (measured by functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging, fMRI).
Diffusion Tensor Imaging After 5 days (immediately after intervention), after 3 months vs baseline (before intervention) Effects of dual tDCS + training vs anodal tDCS + training vs sham-tDCS + training on cerebral microstructure (measured by Diffusion Tensor Imaging, DTI).
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation After 5 days vs baseline (before intervention) Effects of dual tDCS + training vs anodal tDCS + training vs sham tDCS + training on excitability of the primary motor cortex (measured by Motor Evoked Potentials, MEP, using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, TMS).
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Charite Universitätsmedizin Berlin
🇩🇪Berlin, Germany