NCT02695147
Unknown
Not Applicable
Direct Aortic vs Subclavian Access for TAVI: a Review of the Outcomes in the UK
Royal Sussex County Hospital0 sites400 target enrollmentFebruary 2016
ConditionsAortic Stenosis
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Aortic Stenosis
- Sponsor
- Royal Sussex County Hospital
- Enrollment
- 400
- Primary Endpoint
- MACE
- Last Updated
- 10 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
A retrospective analysis of outcomes of all patients who received TAVI via the subclavian or direct aortic approach between January 2011 and January 2016
Investigators
David Hildick-Smith
Consultant Cardiologist
Royal Sussex County Hospital
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Recieve TAVI via subclavian or direct aortic apporach in the UK
Exclusion Criteria
- Not provided
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
MACE
Time Frame: Up to 5 years (average 3 years)
Secondary Outcomes
- Procedural Complications(30 dyas post procedure)
Similar Trials
Active, not recruiting
Not Applicable
The Nordic Aortic Valve Intervention TrialCritical Aortic StenosisNCT01057173Rigshospitalet, Denmark280
Recruiting
Not Applicable
Prospective European Multicenter Study on Aortic Valve Replacement: (E-AVR Registry)Aortic Valve StenosisValve Heart StenosisNCT03143361University of Parma8,000
Unknown
Not Applicable
Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Management of Severe Symptomatic Aortic StenosisAortic Valve StenosisNCT03633383Assiut University50
Unknown
Not Applicable
Comparison of Different Vascular Closure Device in TAVIAortic Valve StenosisTranscatheter Aortic Valve ImplantationNCT05491070National Taiwan University Hospital200
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparison of Transaxillary and Transfemoral Fully-percutaneous Approaches for Transcatheter Aortic Valve ImplantationAortic Valve StenosisNCT04274751Ignacio J. Amat Santos75