Simple Technique to Improve Diagnostic Yield in EUS-FNA

Not Applicable

Completed

• Conditions: Lesion Sampled for Cytology
• Interventions: Other: Twisted Syringe; Other: Conventional Technique

• Registration Number: NCT01995474
• Lead Sponsor: Medical College of Wisconsin

Brief Summary

Endoscopic ultrasound and fine needle aspiration are useful tools for the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer. One potential limitation is contamination when needle traverses the gastrointestinal tract under continuous negative pressure. Gastrointestinal tract contamination can lead to misinterpretation of FNA specimens. We propose a technique to eliminate any remaining negative pressure during EUS-FNA and therefore decrease gastrointestinal tract contamination. Our hypothesis is that briefly untwisting the syringe from the biopsy channel after a specimen is obtained eliminates any remaining negative pressure in the FNA needle and therefore reduces GI tract contamination of EUS-FNA specimens, and will lead to improved diagnostic accuracy of this important clinical technique.

Detailed Description

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has evolved into a minimally invasive diagnostic and staging method. The addition of fine needle aspiration (FNA) increases the accuracy of EUS in the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic malignancies. An ultrasound probe attached to the end of the endoscope allows real-time direct visualization by means of ultrasound transmission. During the FNA process a needle is advanced through the biopsy channel of the endoscope and into the target lesion. In order to obtain a tissue specimen of a suspicious pancreatic lesion, an FNA needle must traverse either the stomach or duodenum to access the pancreatic mass. Once the needle has entered the target lesion a syringe is exchanged for the needle stylet and negative pressure is applied allowing acquisition of a cytology specimen. Negative pressure is released from the syringe and the stop cock is closed to the syringe. However, due to the relatively long length of the needle there is is significant remaining negative pressure at the needle tip. This leads to aspiration of surrounding material including GI mucosal contamination into the needle while removing it from the target lesion.

Contamination of the FNA specimen from gastric or duodenal epithelium can occur with continued negative pressure at the needle tip upon withdrawal of the needle out of the target lesion. While EUS-FNA has a high specificity (96%), sensitivity (87%), and accuracy (94%), gastrointestinal tract contamination can lead to misinterpretation of FNA specimens. Based on clinical experience, we propose a technique to eliminate any remaining negative pressure during EUS-FNA and therefore decreasing gastrointestinal tract contamination.

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2010-02
• Primary Completion: 2012-10
• Study Completion: 2012-10
• Study First Submitted: 2013-04-30
• Status Verified: 2013-11
• Study First Submitted QC: 2013-11-21
• Last Update Submitted: 2013-11-21
• Study First Posted: 2013-11-26
• Last Update Posted: 2013-11-26

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: COMPLETED
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 60

Inclusion Criteria

• Age > 18
• Not pregnant
• Can give consent
• Patients with suspicious GI lesions in need of tissue diagnosis by means of EUS/FNA

Exclusion Criteria

• Pregnant
• Age < 18
• Cannot give consent
• EUS not technically possible

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: SINGLE_GROUP

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Twisted Syringe	Twisted Syringe	briefly disconnecting the syringe from the biopsy channel after a specimen is obtained and then reconnecting it
Conventional Technique	Conventional Technique	syringe is exchanged for the needle stylet and negative pressure is applied allowing acquisition of a cytology specimen.

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Efficacy of FNA biopsy	1 week	The efficacy of fine needle aspiration is assessed using on site cytopathologists who are blinded with respect to the study ARM. The efficacy of diagnostic yield from samples obtained using the needle-off technique is directly compared to the diagnostic yield of samples obtained using conventional technique.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Medical College of Wisconsin; 🇺🇸 Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States