MedPath

Comparison Between 2l vs 3l in HFNC During the Initial Management of Severe Bronchiolitis in Infants

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Bronchiolitis
Interventions
Device: treatment by 3l/min/kg in High Flow Nasal cannula (HFNC)
Device: treatment by 2l/min/kg in High Flow Nasal cannula (HFNC)
Registration Number
NCT02824744
Lead Sponsor
University Hospital, Montpellier
Brief Summary

The purpose of the study is to evaluate prospectively the clinical benefits of 2 different flow with High flow nasal canula (HFNC: 2l/kg/min) versus (HFNC: 2l/kg/min) in the initial management of bronchiolitis in infants.

Design: Prospective, controlled, randomized, multi-center.

Design: Infants less than 6 month admitted in pediatric intensive care unit for respiratory distress (mWCAS \>3) secondary to bronchiolitis but not requiring mechanical ventilation will be randomized in two groups:HFNC "2l/min/kg" or HFNC "3l/min/kg" during 24 hours.

Conditions of measurements:

Primary endpoint: Proportion of failure in both arms during the first 24 hours.

Failure criteria: A raise of the Clinical score for respiratory distress (mWCAS) (1 point) or respiratory rate (10/min /H0 and above 60/min) or discomfort (EDIN) (1point /H0 and above 4) or apnea.

Secondary outcomes: Assessment at H1, H12, H24 of mWCAS, respiratory and heart rate, EDIN score, skin lesions, FiO2 required to achieve an oxygen saturation between 94 and 97%, transcutaneous PCO2 (correlated to an initial gas analysis), Report SpO2 / FiO2

Statistic: Intention to treat Analysis.

Expected number of patients: 135 per arm: 270 children.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
300
Inclusion Criteria
  • age < 6 months
  • bronchiolitis
  • mWCAS > or =3
  • hospitalisation: PICU
  • signed consent form by parents
Exclusion Criteria
  • Intubated patient
  • Neurological or cardiac disease

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
treatment by 3l/min/kg in HFNCtreatment by 3l/min/kg in High Flow Nasal cannula (HFNC)treatment by 3l/min/kg in High Flow Nasal cannula (HFNC) during the initial management of severe bronchiolitis in infants (0-6 months years old)
treatment by 2l/min/kg in HFNCtreatment by 2l/min/kg in High Flow Nasal cannula (HFNC)treatment by 2l/min/kg in High Flow Nasal cannula (HFNC) during the initial management of severe bronchiolitis in infants (0-6 months years old)
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Proportion of failure in both armsup to 24 hours

Proportion of failure in both arms during the first 24 hours. Failure criteria: A raise of the Clinical score for respiratory distress (mWCAS) (1 point) or respiratory rate (10/min /H0 and above 60/min) or discomfort (EDIN) (1point /H0 and above 4) or apnea.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
assessment of heart rate in both armup to 24 hours
number of participants with an aggravation of the clinical score for respiratory distress arms (mWCAS)up to 24 hours
Assessment of the discomfort in both arms with the score of EDINup to 24 hours
assessment of the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) in both armsup to 24 hours

FiO2 required to achieve an oxygen saturation between 94 and 97%

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University hospital of Montpellier

🇫🇷

Montpellier, France

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath