l Comparison Of Ultrasound -Guided Internal Jugular Vein And Supraclavicular Subclavian Vein -A Randomized Control Trial
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 160
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- First attempt success rate and immediate complication such as hematoma , carotid artery puncture , pneumothorax.
研究概览
简要总结
Central venous cannulation (CVC) is a vital intervention in the operation theatre, intensive
care unit, and emergency room. Common clinical applications of CVC include central
venous pressure (CVP) monitoring in major surgeries, administration of drugs,
hyperosmolar solutions and blood products.
Internal jugular vein (IJV) cannulation being the most adopted route for central venous
access, it is associated with several problems like proximity to neck vessels leading to
arterial puncture, and difficulty in access in obese, edematous, and hypovolemic patients.
The subclavian vein is advantageous anatomically owing to its huge caliber, absence of
valves, and support of surrounding structures which keeps the vein patent even in shock.
Traditionally, the internal jugular vein (IJV) and subclavian vein have been the preferred sites
for central venous access.
With advances in technology, the use of ultrasound has become the standard of care in
medical practice overcoming the limitations of landmark-based techniques. Ultrasound allows
realtime visualization of the vein ensuring successful cannulation with fewer attempts and
less complication rate.However, the choice between these two approaches remains a
subject of clinical debate, especially with the advent of ultrasound guidance, which has
significantly improved the accuracy and safety of these procedures.
As anesthesiologist Tomasz Czarnik and co-authors (2009) say: “In conclusion, subclavian
venous cannulation via the supraclavicular approach is an excellent method of central venous
access in anesthesia. The procedure success rate and the significant complication rate are
comparable to other techniques of central venous cannulation especially to jugular access,
which is regarded by most physicians as the safest one. Mechanical ventilation is not a risk
factor associated with significant complications. The supraclavicular approach should be
considered, especially in neuroanesthesia, where the right jugular approach could be
associated with cerebral perfusion pressure reduction, intracranial pressure elevation, and
venous stasis. The supraclavicular approach seems to be more comfortable than the jugular
approach in a conscious patient. This method can be successfully and relatively safely used
as a primary or alternative technique when other catheterization sites are not available to
augment the spectrum of catheterization possibilities, even in mechanically ventilated
patients”.
This thesis aims to compare the efficacy, safety, and clinical outcomes of ultrasound-guided
internal jugular vein and supraclavicular subclavian vein cannulation.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 盲法
- Participant Blinded
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18.00 Year(s) 至 80.00 Year(s)(—)
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •All adult patients from 18years to 80 years , undergoing all major elective surgeries .And patients who are able to provide consent are included in the study.
排除标准
- •Prior ipsilateral venous cannulation will not be included in the study.
- •Any contraindication to ultrasound guidance .
- •Pregnant patient not included in the study and patient on anticoagulation therapy also not included in the study.
结局指标
主要结局
First attempt success rate and immediate complication such as hematoma , carotid artery puncture , pneumothorax.
时间窗: 20 minutes
次要结局
- Time of insertion & operator satisfaction.(10 minutes)
研究者
Sumit Chikara
Army Hospital Research and Referral
